These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Class actions in breast implant litigation. Peerless MJ; Eizenga MA Health Law Can; 1996 Feb; 16(3):78-83. PubMed ID: 10173416 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Prescription for fairness: a new approach to tort liability of brand-name and generic drug manufacturers. Rostron A Duke Law J; 2011 Feb; 60(5):1123-91. PubMed ID: 21365961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Krever can name names, Supreme Court rules. Capen K CMAJ; 1997 Nov; 157(9):1265. PubMed ID: 9361649 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Cough up that cash. Farley CJ Time; 1995 Mar; 145(9):47. PubMed ID: 10140721 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Reuse of disposable equipment. Medicolegal viewpoint]. Fallani M; Milandri M Minerva Cardioangiol; 1996 May; 44(5):263-73. PubMed ID: 8927256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Perspectives. Battle heats up over product liability reform. Miller D Faulkner Grays Med Health; 1995 Apr; 49(17):suppl 1-4. PubMed ID: 10141116 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Products liability implications of reprocessing and reuse of single-use medical devices. Hogan JM; Colonna TE Food Drug Law J; 1998; 53(3):385-402. PubMed ID: 10346717 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Implant manufacturer and physician: must both warn the patient of a product's risks? Reed ME; Olson CA Bull Am Coll Surg; 1985 May; 70(5):19-21. PubMed ID: 10270920 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Changing technology in health: product liability. Kelly JG Collegian; 1998 Apr; 5(2):24-9. PubMed ID: 9644337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Silicone breast implants. Can emerging medical, legal, and scientific concepts be reconciled? Snyder JW J Leg Med; 1997 Jun; 18(2):133-220. PubMed ID: 9230567 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Medical devices; preemption of state product liability claims--FDA. Correction. Fed Regist; 1997 Dec; 62(242):66179. PubMed ID: 10179302 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The Lohr decision: FDA perspective and position. Porter MJ Food Drug Law J; 1997; 52(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 10346705 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Silicone breast implant litigation (Part 2). Shiffman MA Med Law; 1995; 14(1-2):59-85. PubMed ID: 7666749 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Florida court asked to decide legality of limiting suits. AIDS Policy Law; 1996 Jun; 11(11):5. PubMed ID: 11363564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Medical devices; preemption of state product liability claims--FDA. Withdrawal of proposed rule. Fed Regist; 1998 Jul; 63(142):39789-90. PubMed ID: 10181516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Medical devices; preemption of state product liability claims--FDA. Proposed rule. Fed Regist; 1997 Dec; 62(239):65384-8. PubMed ID: 10176832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]