These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10159682)
1. Pap devices seek to star in clinical galaxy. Check WA CAP Today; 1995 Sep; 9(9):1, 24, 26 passim. PubMed ID: 10159682 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Prospects for automated cytology. Richart RM; Patten SF; Lee JS Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 1996 Dec; 23(4):853-9. PubMed ID: 8989778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. NeoPath, Inc. NeoPath AutoPap 300 Automatic Pap Screener System. Patten SF; Lee JS; Nelson AC Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 8604574 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Too early to solve Pap device puzzle. Check W CAP Today; 1997 Jun; 11(6):1, 44-6, 48-9 passim. PubMed ID: 10174227 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Papanicolau smears: reducing the false negative rate by improving the method]. Biran G; Levy T Harefuah; 2004 Mar; 143(3):217-21, 245. PubMed ID: 15065363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Terminology of false negative and false positive Pap smears: "They're just worms". Naryshkin S; Davey DD Diagn Cytopathol; 1996 Feb; 14(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 8834068 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The effectiveness of cytological rescreening in the reduction of false negative/positive Pap reports. Cernescu EC; Anton G; Ruţă S; Cernescu C Roum Arch Microbiol Immunol; 2013; 72(2):93-104. PubMed ID: 24187808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A gridded Pap slide to assure quality with high throughput. Sechler GE; Goldsmith S Am Clin Lab; 1991 Apr; 10(3):32-3. PubMed ID: 10150102 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]