These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10159853)

  • 1. Breast implant imaging homes in on tiny leaks.
    Wagner SK
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1996 Mar; 18(3):51-2, 57. PubMed ID: 10159853
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ultrasound evolves as implant imaging tool.
    Wagner SK
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1997 Jan; 19(1):52-4. PubMed ID: 10165113
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mammographic evaluation of the augmented breast.
    Newman J
    Radiol Technol; 1998; 69(4):319-38; quiz 339-42. PubMed ID: 9549763
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the augmented breast.
    Reynolds HE
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1995 Nov; 33(6):1131-45. PubMed ID: 7480661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Re: The life span of silicone gel breast implants and a comparison of mammography, ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance imaging in detecting implant rupture: a meta-analysis.
    Dowden R
    Ann Plast Surg; 1999 Jul; 43(1):99-100. PubMed ID: 10402997
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The role of diagnostic imaging in women with breast implants.
    Barloon TJ; Young DC; Bergus G
    Am Fam Physician; 1996 Nov; 54(6):2029-36. PubMed ID: 8900362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Breast implants and radiology].
    Tønseth KA; Stubberud K; Tindholdt TT
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2004 May; 124(10):1422. PubMed ID: 15195188
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Imaging of the patient with silicone gel breast implants.
    Piccoli CW
    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2001 May; 9(2):393-408, vii-viii. PubMed ID: 11493428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical imaging diagnosis of implant materials for breast augmentation.
    Kawahara S; Hyakusoku H; Ogawa R; Ohkubo S; Igarashi H; Hirakawa K
    Ann Plast Surg; 2006 Jul; 57(1):6-12. PubMed ID: 16799300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Breast implant rupture.
    Spinhoven M; De Schepper A
    JBR-BTR; 2006; 89(3):146-7. PubMed ID: 16883765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. MR evaluation of breast implants.
    Germer J
    Radiol Technol; 2002; 73(6):573-7. PubMed ID: 12154658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Diagnosis of breast diseases with magnetic resonance tomography].
    Kvistad KA; Gribbestad IS; Haraldseth O; Nilsen G
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2000 May; 120(12):1451-8. PubMed ID: 10851944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Age-related structural and functional changes in the breast: multimodality correlation with digital mammography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography.
    Abramson RG; Mavi A; Cermik T; Basu S; Wehrli NE; Houseni M; Mishra S; Udupa J; Lakhani P; Maidment AD; Torigian DA; Alavi A
    Semin Nucl Med; 2007 May; 37(3):146-53. PubMed ID: 17418148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Magnetic resonance tomography in the diagnostics of breast implants: a survey].
    Hauth EA; Hoffmann O; Zadow-Eulerich T; Kimmig R; Forsting M
    Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 2008; 48(2):76-83. PubMed ID: 18431047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fat necrosis of the breast: mammographic, sonographic, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging findings.
    Chala LF; de Barros N; de Camargo Moraes P; Endo E; Kim SJ; Pincerato KM; Carvalho FM; Cerri GG
    Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2004; 33(3):106-26. PubMed ID: 15215818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [-Possibilities and limits of imaging for evaluating breast implants-].
    Tristant H
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1995; 256 Suppl():S135-47. PubMed ID: 8619648
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Utility of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography in diagnosing breast implant rupture.
    Weizer G; Malone RS; Netscher DT; Walker LE; Thornby J
    Ann Plast Surg; 1995 Apr; 34(4):352-61. PubMed ID: 7793779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Magnetic resonance imaging of Trilucent TM breast implants.
    Elson EM; Jones A; King R; Chapman P; Stanek J; Irvine AT; Bingham JB
    Clin Radiol; 2002 Apr; 57(4):263-7. PubMed ID: 12014870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evolving role of imaging modalities in inflammatory breast cancer.
    Le-Petross CH; Bidaut L; Yang WT
    Semin Oncol; 2008 Feb; 35(1):51-63. PubMed ID: 18308146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Unilateral osmotic swelling in textured, single-lumen, saline-filled mammary implants: clinical and MRI findings.
    Ketene M; Saray A; Kara SA
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2002; 26(3):206-10. PubMed ID: 12140701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.