282 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10159931)
1. The effect of the ACOG guideline on vaginal births after cesarean.
Santerre RE
Med Care Res Rev; 1996 Sep; 53(3):315-29. PubMed ID: 10159931
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Women in the crossfire: forced repeat cesareans.
Jukelevics N
Birth; 2002 Jun; 29(2):149-50. PubMed ID: 12000419
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of public accountability on hospital performance: trends in rates for cesarean sections and vaginal births after cesarean section in Cleveland, Ohio.
Caron A; Neuhauser D
Qual Manag Health Care; 1999; 7(2):1-10. PubMed ID: 10346457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. U.S. trends in obstetric procedures, 1990-2000.
Kozak LJ; Weeks JD
Birth; 2002 Sep; 29(3):157-61. PubMed ID: 12153645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical application of quality improvement concepts and tools: C-Section process improvement.
Zimmerman M; Stephens S
J AHIMA; 1993 Mar; 64(3):63-9. PubMed ID: 10124564
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The UTAH VBAC Study.
Gochnour G; Ratcliffe S; Stone MB
Matern Child Health J; 2005 Jun; 9(2):181-8. PubMed ID: 15965624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. When push comes to shove: implementing VBAC practice guidelines.
Coulter CH; Lehrfeld R
Physician Exec; 1995 Jun; 21(6):30-5. PubMed ID: 10161334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Consumer reports in health care. Do they make a difference in patient care?
Longo DR; Land G; Schramm W; Fraas J; Hoskins B; Howell V
JAMA; 1997 Nov; 278(19):1579-84. PubMed ID: 9370503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Abuse of caesarean delivery in Brazil: geographic dimensions of a medical aberration].
Waniez P; Wurtz B; Brustlein V
Sante; 2006; 16(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 16777610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Differences among primary care physicians' adherence to 2009 ACOG guidelines for cervical cancer screening.
Corbelli J; Borrero S; Bonnema R; McNamara M; Kraemer K; Rubio D; Karpov I; McNeil M
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2014 May; 23(5):397-403. PubMed ID: 24380500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. ACOG urges a cautious approach to vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.
Rose VL
Am Fam Physician; 1999 Sep; 60(4):1245-6. PubMed ID: 10507750
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. ACOG committee opinion. Rate of vaginal births after cesarean delivery. Number 179, November 1996. Committee on Obstetric Practice. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1997 Apr; 57(1):89-90. PubMed ID: 9175677
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The new obstetric ultrasound guidelines: some concerns.
Schreckengost JL; Filly RA; ; ;
J Ultrasound Med; 2005 Dec; 24(12):1752-4. PubMed ID: 16301736
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The decreasing trend in early-term repeat cesarean deliveries in the United States: 2005 through 2014.
Razavi AS; Chasen ST; Grunebaum A
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Mar; 216(3):321-322. PubMed ID: 27818133
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The impact of nonclinical factors on repeat cesarean section.
Stafford RS
JAMA; 1991 Jan; 265(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 1984126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. ACOG releases practice guidelines on vaginal delivery after previous cesarean birth.
Am Fam Physician; 1996 Feb; 53(2):775-6. PubMed ID: 8629548
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Alternative strategies for controlling rising cesarean section rates.
Stafford RS
JAMA; 1990 Feb; 263(5):683-7. PubMed ID: 2296123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Vaginal birth after cesarean: a 5-year experience in a family practice residency program.
Miller ES; Partezana J; Montgomery RL
J Am Board Fam Pract; 1995; 8(5):357-60. PubMed ID: 7484222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Socioeconomic factors and the odds of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.
King DE; Lahiri K
JAMA; 1994 Aug; 272(7):524-9. PubMed ID: 8046806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. What every midwife should know about ACOG and VBAC. Critique of ACOG Practice Bulletin #5, July 1999, "Vaginal birth after previous cesarean section".
Wagner M
Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 2001; (59):41-3. PubMed ID: 12152554
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
