BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

425 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10160047)

  • 1. A comparison of Omaha worksite health promotion activities to the 1992 national survey with a special perspective on program intervention.
    Eickhoff-Shemek JM; Ryan KF
    Am J Health Promot; 1995; 10(2):132-9. PubMed ID: 10160047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Results of the 2004 National Worksite Health Promotion Survey.
    Linnan L; Bowling M; Childress J; Lindsay G; Blakey C; Pronk S; Wieker S; Royall P
    Am J Public Health; 2008 Aug; 98(8):1503-9. PubMed ID: 18048790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Characteristics of health promotion programs in Federal worksites: findings from the Federal Employee Worksite Project.
    Carter WB; Omenn GS; Martin M; Crump C; Grunbaum JA; Williams OD
    Am J Health Promot; 1995; 10(2):140-7. PubMed ID: 10160048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The association between the presence of occupational health nurses at Japanese worksites and health promotion activities].
    Kanamori S; Kai Y; Kawamata K; Kusumoto M; Takamiya T; Ohya Y; Odagiri Y; Fukushima N; Inoue S
    Sangyo Eiseigaku Zasshi; 2015; 57(6):297-305. PubMed ID: 26268550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Health promotion programs in small worksites: results of a national survey.
    Wilson MG; DeJoy DM; Jorgensen CM; Crump CJ
    Am J Health Promot; 1999; 13(6):358-65. PubMed ID: 10557508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Employee advisory boards as a vehicle for organizing worksite health promotion programs.
    Sorensen G; Hsieh J; Hunt MK; Morris DH; Harris DR; Fitzgerald G
    Am J Health Promot; 1992; 6(6):443-50, 464. PubMed ID: 10148721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Worksite health promotion in four Midwest cities.
    Weisbrod RR; Pirie PL; Bracht NF; Elstun P
    J Community Health; 1991 Jun; 16(3):169-77. PubMed ID: 1860969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cancer screening offered by worksites--United States, 1992 and 1995.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
    MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 1997 May; 46(19):421-4. PubMed ID: 9162843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Maximizing worksite survey response rates through community organization strategies and multiple contacts.
    Thompson B; Bowen DJ; Croyle RT; Hopp HP; Fries E
    Am J Health Promot; 1991; 6(2):130-7. PubMed ID: 10148687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Worksite health promotion programs in the U.S.: factors associated with availability and participation.
    Grosch JW; Alterman T; Petersen MR; Murphy LR
    Am J Health Promot; 1998; 13(1):36-45. PubMed ID: 10186933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Results of the Workplace Health in America Survey.
    Linnan LA; Cluff L; Lang JE; Penne M; Leff MS
    Am J Health Promot; 2019 Jun; 33(5):652-665. PubMed ID: 31007038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Medics as a channel for worksite health promotion in remote global locations.
    Bisits Bullen PA
    Am J Health Promot; 2012; 26(6):352-5. PubMed ID: 22747317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Vending Assessment and Program Implementation in Four Iowa Worksites.
    Lillehoj CJ; Nothwehr F; Shipley K; Voss C
    Health Promot Pract; 2015 Nov; 16(6):814-25. PubMed ID: 26220278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A review of health-related outcomes of multi-component worksite health promotion programs.
    Heaney CA; Goetzel RZ
    Am J Health Promot; 1997; 11(4):290-307. PubMed ID: 10165522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Corporate characteristics and worksite health promotion programs: survey findings from Fortune 500 companies.
    Hollander RB; Lengermann JJ
    Soc Sci Med; 1988; 26(5):491-501. PubMed ID: 3127893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Worksite health and safety climate: scale development and effects of a health promotion intervention.
    Basen-Engquist K; Hudmon KS; Tripp M; Chamberlain R
    Prev Med; 1998; 27(1):111-9. PubMed ID: 9465361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the implementation of Get Healthy at Work, a workplace health promotion program in New South Wales, Australia.
    Khanal S; Lloyd B; Rissel C; Portors C; Grunseit A; Indig D; Ibrahim I; McElduff S
    Health Promot J Austr; 2016 Feb; 27(3):243-250. PubMed ID: 27816068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Worksite characteristics and changes in worksite tobacco-control initiatives. Results from the COMMIT study.
    Sorensen G; Glasgow RE; Topor M; Corbett K
    J Occup Environ Med; 1997 Jun; 39(6):520-6. PubMed ID: 9211209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. We're working hard, but is it hardly working? Why process is critical in the delivery of worksite health promotion programs.
    Felter EM; Nolan BA; Colombi A; Albert SM; Pringle JL
    J Occup Environ Med; 2013 May; 55(5):586-92. PubMed ID: 23618894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Workplace Health Promotion in Small, Medium-Sized and Large Enterprises of the Health-Care Sector - Frequency, Reasons for the Company Management to Take Action and Barriers to Implementation].
    Schaefer E; Drexler H; Kiesel J
    Gesundheitswesen; 2016 Mar; 78(3):161-5. PubMed ID: 25704843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.