317 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10160098)
1. Cost-effective policies for cervical cancer screening. An international review.
Fahs MC; Plichta SB; Mandelblatt JS
Pharmacoeconomics; 1996 Mar; 9(3):211-30. PubMed ID: 10160098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-effectiveness analysis for Pap smear screening and human papillomavirus DNA testing and vaccination.
Chen MK; Hung HF; Duffy S; Yen AM; Chen HH
J Eval Clin Pract; 2011 Dec; 17(6):1050-8. PubMed ID: 21679279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost-effectiveness of the conventional papanicolaou test with a new adjunct to cytological screening for squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix and its precursors.
Taylor LA; Sorensen SV; Ray NF; Halpern MT; Harper DM
Arch Fam Med; 2000 Aug; 9(8):713-21. PubMed ID: 10927709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Liquid-based cytology in cervical screening: an updated rapid and systematic review and economic analysis.
Karnon J; Peters J; Platt J; Chilcott J; McGoogan E; Brewer N
Health Technol Assess; 2004 May; 8(20):iii, 1-78. PubMed ID: 15147611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative cost-effectiveness of HPV vaccines in the prevention of cervical cancer in Malaysia.
Ezat SW; Aljunid S
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2010; 11(4):943-51. PubMed ID: 21133606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Cost-effectiveness of a cervical cancer screening programme in the Algarve region, Portugal].
Novoa Vázquez RM
Rev Esp Salud Publica; 2004; 78(3):341-53. PubMed ID: 15293955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening: comparison of screening policies.
van den Akker-van Marle ME; van Ballegooijen M; van Oortmarssen GJ; Boer R; Habbema JD
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2002 Feb; 94(3):193-204. PubMed ID: 11830609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-effectiveness of 3 methods to enhance the sensitivity of Papanicolaou testing.
Brown AD; Garber AM
JAMA; 1999 Jan; 281(4):347-53. PubMed ID: 9929088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The cervical cancer screening programme in Norway, 1992-2000: changes in Pap smear coverage and incidence of cervical cancer.
Nygård JF; Skare GB; Thoresen SØ
J Med Screen; 2002; 9(2):86-91. PubMed ID: 12133929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of patient adherence and test performance on the cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening in developing countries: the case of Honduras.
Perkins RB; Langrish SM; Stern LJ; Burgess JF; Simon CJ
Womens Health Issues; 2010; 20(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 19944623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cervical cancer screening program of Paraná: cost-effective model in a developing country.
Bleggi Torres LF; Werner B; Totsugui J; Collaço LM; Araújo SR; Huçulak M; Boza EJ; Fischer RM; De Laat L; Sobbania LC; Raggio A
Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Jul; 29(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 12827718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Costs of population cervical cancer screening program in Poland between 2007-2009].
Spaczyński M; Karowicz-Bilinska A; Kedzia W; Molińska-Glura M; Seroczyński P; Januszek-Michalecka L; Rokita W; Nowak-Markwitz E
Ginekol Pol; 2010 Oct; 81(10):750-6. PubMed ID: 21117303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost effective analysis of recall methods for cervical cancer screening in Selangor--results from a prospective randomized controlled trial.
Rashid RM; Ramli S; John J; Dahlui M
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(13):5143-7. PubMed ID: 25040965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cervical cancer screening in the United States and the Netherlands: a tale of two countries.
Habbema D; De Kok IM; Brown ML
Milbank Q; 2012 Mar; 90(1):5-37. PubMed ID: 22428690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Cost effectiveness of cervical cancer screening strategies in Tunisia].
Hsaïri M; Fakhfakh R; Ghyoula M; Ben Abdallah M; Achour N
Tunis Med; 2000 Oct; 78(10):557-61. PubMed ID: 11190738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vitro conventional cytology historical strengths and current limitations.
Spitzer M
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2002 Dec; 29(4):673-83. PubMed ID: 12509091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of cervical cancer screening and follow-up programs.
Celentano DD; deLissovoy G
Public Health Rev; 1989-1990; 17(2-3):173-240. PubMed ID: 2518819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of nationwide cervical cancer screening in Taiwan.
Koong SL; Yen AM; Chen TH
J Med Screen; 2006; 13 Suppl 1():S44-7. PubMed ID: 17227642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. De novo establishment and cost-effectiveness of Papanicolaou cytology screening services in the Socialist Republic of Vietnam.
Suba EJ; Nguyen CH; Nguyen BD; Raab SS;
Cancer; 2001 Mar; 91(5):928-39. PubMed ID: 11251944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prevention of cervical cancer with screening programme in Branicevo District and cost-effectiveness analysis adjusted to the territory of the Republic of Serbia.
Perovic S
J BUON; 2009; 14(1):93-6. PubMed ID: 19373953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
