BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

395 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10161371)

  • 1. Filgrastim. A reappraisal of pharmacoeconomic considerations in the prophylaxis and treatment of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia.
    Frampton JE; Faulds D
    Pharmacoeconomics; 1996 Jan; 9(1):76-96. PubMed ID: 10161371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Filgrastim. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy in neutropenia.
    Frampton JE; Lee CR; Faulds D
    Drugs; 1994 Nov; 48(5):731-60. PubMed ID: 7530630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Lenograstim. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy in neutropenia and related clinical settings.
    Frampton JE; Yarker YE; Goa KL
    Drugs; 1995 May; 49(5):767-93. PubMed ID: 7541335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Colony-stimulating factors for the management of neutropenia in cancer patients.
    Dale DC
    Drugs; 2002; 62 Suppl 1():1-15. PubMed ID: 12479591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Recombinant granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (rGM-CSF): an appraisal of its pharmacoeconomic status in neutropenia associated with chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow transplant.
    Goa KL; Bryson HM
    Pharmacoeconomics; 1994 Jan; 5(1):56-77. PubMed ID: 10146867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A novel approach to maintain planned dose chemotherapy on time: a decision-making tool to improve patient care.
    Lyman GH
    Eur J Cancer; 2000 Apr; 36 Suppl 1():S15-21. PubMed ID: 10785605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Economic evaluations of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: in the prevention and treatment of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia.
    Esser M; Brunner H
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2003; 21(18):1295-313. PubMed ID: 14750898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Pegfilgrastim vs filgrastim in primary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia in patients with breast cancer after chemotherapy: a cost-effectiveness analysis for Germany].
    Sehouli J; Goertz A; Steinle T; Dubois R; Plesnila-Frank C; Lalla A; von Minckwitz G
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2010 Mar; 135(9):385-9. PubMed ID: 20180162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors in the management of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia: evidence based review.
    Bhana N
    Curr Opin Oncol; 2007 Jul; 19(4):328-35. PubMed ID: 17545795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost-effectiveness of filgrastim and pegfilgrastim as primary prophylaxis against febrile neutropenia in lymphoma patients.
    Lathia N; Isogai PK; De Angelis C; Smith TJ; Cheung M; Mittmann N; Hoch JS; Walker S
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2013 Aug; 105(15):1078-85. PubMed ID: 23873405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cost effectiveness of pegfilgrastim versus filgrastim after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with lymphoma and myeloma: an economic evaluation of the PALM Trial.
    Perrier L; Lefranc A; Pérol D; Quittet P; Schmidt-Tanguy A; Siani C; de Peretti C; Favier B; Biron P; Moreau P; Bay JO; Lissandre S; Jardin F; Espinouse D; Sebban C
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2013 Apr; 11(2):129-38. PubMed ID: 23435861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Therapeutic use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors for established febrile neutropenia: effect on costs from a hospital perspective.
    Cosler LE; Eldar-Lissai A; Culakova E; Kuderer NM; Dale D; Crawford J; Lyman GH
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2007; 25(4):343-51. PubMed ID: 17402806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Health care outcomes case study: Febrile neutropenia.
    Holdsworth MT; Duncan MH
    Am J Health Syst Pharm; 1995 Oct; 52(19 Suppl 4):S15-8. PubMed ID: 8846241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pegfilgrastim.
    Willis F; Pettengell R
    Expert Opin Biol Ther; 2002 Dec; 2(8):985-92. PubMed ID: 12517276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The clinical utility of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: early achievements and future promise.
    Morstyn G; Foote M; Perkins D; Vincent M
    Stem Cells; 1994; 12 Suppl 1():213-27; discussion 227-8. PubMed ID: 7535147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative cost-efficiency across the European G5 countries of various regimens of filgrastim, biosimilar filgrastim, and pegfilgrastim to reduce the incidence of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia.
    Aapro M; Cornes P; Abraham I
    J Oncol Pharm Pract; 2012 Jun; 18(2):171-9. PubMed ID: 21610020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lenograstim: an update of its pharmacological properties and use in chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and related clinical settings.
    Dunn CJ; Goa KL
    Drugs; 2000 Mar; 59(3):681-717. PubMed ID: 10776839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prophylactic administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (filgrastim) after conventional chemotherapy in children with cancer.
    Riikonen P; Rahiala J; Salonvaara M; Perkkiö M
    Stem Cells; 1995 May; 13(3):289-94. PubMed ID: 7542114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Prevention and treatment of febrile neutropenia].
    Montemurro F; Gallicchio M; Aglietta M
    Tumori; 1997; 83(2 Suppl):S15-9. PubMed ID: 9235724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rG-CSF): pharmacoeconomic considerations in chemotherapy-induced neutropenia.
    Faulds D; Lewis NJ; Milne RJ
    Pharmacoeconomics; 1992 Apr; 1(4):231-49. PubMed ID: 10147015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.