These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10162092)
1. Embryonic law: a legal development. Sojka LA Bull Am Coll Surg; 1996 Oct; 81(10):32-5. PubMed ID: 10162092 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Beyond the right to life--the right to health. Camissa SM; Ziontz N Leg Med; 1987; ():179-99. PubMed ID: 3333072 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Do fetal rights limit mothers' rights? State Legis; 2002 Jun; 28(6):6. PubMed ID: 12051253 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Privacy rights and abortion outing: a proposal for using common-law torts to protect abortion patients and staff. Clapman A Yale Law J; 2003 Apr; 112(6):1545-76. PubMed ID: 15046034 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Toward a new analysis of the abortion debate. Bell KL Ariz Law Rev; 1991; 33(4):907-35. PubMed ID: 11656167 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Abortion: issues of access, policy, rights continue to be tested. Bernstein AH Hospitals; 1980 Feb; 54(3):28-30. PubMed ID: 7351319 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Inconsistencies in the legal status of an unborn child: recognition of a fetus as potential life. Shah MK Hofstra Law Rev; 2001; 29(3):931-69. PubMed ID: 16189918 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. An introduction to legal thought: four approaches to law and to the allocation of body parts. Calabresi G Stanford Law Rev; 2003 Jun; 55(6):2113-51. PubMed ID: 12908477 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Health care law. Mayo TW SMU Law Rev; 2003; 56(3):1767-82. PubMed ID: 12924424 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Abortion counseling and the First Amendment: open questions after Webster. Pine RN Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):189-97. PubMed ID: 2603861 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Canada's abortion law and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Martin SL Can J Women Law; 1986; 1(2):339-84. PubMed ID: 11651094 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Fetal interests vs. maternal rights: is the state going too far? Trindel RM Akron Law Rev; 1991; 24(3-4):743-62. PubMed ID: 16273672 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Prenatal v. parental rights: what a difference an "a" makes. Gallagher A St Marys Law J; 1989; 21(2):301-24. PubMed ID: 16100799 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Consensual sex without assuming the risk of carrying an unwanted fetus; another foundation for the right to an abortion. Walen A Brooklyn Law Rev; 1997; 63():1051-140. PubMed ID: 12173635 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Why the unconstitutional conditions doctrine is an anachronism (with particular reference to religion, speech, and abortion). Sunstein CR Boston Univ Law Rev; 1990 Jul; 70(4):593-621. PubMed ID: 15739275 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Reform of German abortion law: first experiences. Eser A Am J Comp Law; 1986; 34(2):369-83. PubMed ID: 11655825 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Title X, the abortion debate, and the First Amendment. Shapiro AA Columbia Law Rev; 1990 Oct; 90(6):1737-78. PubMed ID: 15739274 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Freedom at home: state constitutions and Medicaid funding for abortions. Vanzi LM N M Law Rev; 1996; 26(3):433-54. PubMed ID: 16100794 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The constitution and clinic protests: the battlefield of abortion rights adversaries. Vold J J Health Hosp Law; 1994 Apr; 27(4):104-13. PubMed ID: 10136113 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]