These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10162659)

  • 41. A preliminary examination of patient loyalty: an application of the customer loyalty classification framework in the health care industry.
    Heiens RA; Pleshko LP
    J Hosp Mark; 1997; 11(2):105-14. PubMed ID: 10163912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A standard approach. AHRQ readies tool to gauge patient satisfaction.
    Tieman J
    Mod Healthc; 2004 Nov; 34(47):8-9. PubMed ID: 15624293
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Open-ended questions in surveys of patients' satisfaction with family doctors.
    Marcinowicz L; Chlabicz S; Grebowski R
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2007 Apr; 12(2):86-9. PubMed ID: 17407657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The voice of the patient: a national, representative study of satisfaction with family physicians.
    Wolosin RJ
    Qual Manag Health Care; 2005; 14(3):155-64. PubMed ID: 16027593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Satisfaction and quality: patient and physician perspectives.
    Reed MC; St Peter RF
    Data Bull (Cent Stud Health Syst Change); 1997; (3):1-2. PubMed ID: 12577937
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. HCAHPS replaces Press Ganey survey as quality measure for patient hospital experience.
    Zusman EE
    Neurosurgery; 2012 Aug; 71(2):N21-4. PubMed ID: 22811203
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Largest survey of hospital patient satisfaction.
    Health Care Food Nutr Focus; 1997 Aug; 13(12):7-8. PubMed ID: 10169220
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A randomized controlled study comparing educational outcomes of examination room versus conference room staffing.
    Petersen K; Rosenbaum ME; Kreiter CD; Thomas A; Vogelgesang SA; Lawry GV
    Teach Learn Med; 2008; 20(3):218-24. PubMed ID: 18615295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Patient satisfaction rates are too high.
    Alt SJ
    Health Care Strateg Manage; 1995 Aug; 13(8):2-3. PubMed ID: 10144166
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Is this satisfaction survey satisfactory? Some points to consider in their planning and assessment.
    Bisset AF; Chesson R
    Health Bull (Edinb); 2000 Jan; 58(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 12813852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Striving to capture the voice of the patient.
    Scott L
    Hosp Health Netw; 2010 Dec; 84(12):26. PubMed ID: 21268500
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Focus groups help doctors understand patient needs.
    Physician Relat Update; 1997 Jun; 6(6):68-9. PubMed ID: 10167416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Good hospitals.
    Kaebnick GE
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2015; 45(3):2. PubMed ID: 25944193
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Recognizing unique domains of quality surgical care.
    Sheetz KH; Englesbe MJ
    Ann Surg; 2015 Jan; 261(1):9-11. PubMed ID: 25211273
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Comparing and selecting patient satisfaction questionnaires.
    Trandel-Kornechuk DM
    Med Group Manage J; 1998; 45(3):66-8, 70, 72-7. PubMed ID: 10181641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. An evaluation of the impact of nonresponse bias on patient satisfaction surveys.
    Lasek RJ; Barkley W; Harper DL; Rosenthal GE
    Med Care; 1997 Jun; 35(6):646-52. PubMed ID: 9191708
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [Soften punishment in malpractive cases! Prevent occurrence of a culture of dissatisfaction and revenge!].
    Jacobsson L
    Lakartidningen; 1995 Nov; 92(48):4534, 4539. PubMed ID: 7490965
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Assessing patient satisfaction across the continuum of ambulatory care: a revalidation and validation of care-specific surveys.
    Seibert JH; Brien JS; Maaske BL; Kochurka K; Feldt K; Fader L; Race KE
    J Ambul Care Manage; 1999 Apr; 22(2):9-26. PubMed ID: 10387587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Think through issues in satisfaction survey change.
    Patient Focus Care Satisf; 1998 Jul; 6(7):79-81. PubMed ID: 10182955
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Telltale heart skips a few beats: challenging conclusions of EMS customer satisfaction.
    Schears RM
    Acad Emerg Med; 2004 Feb; 11(2):214; author reply 214-5. PubMed ID: 14759972
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.