194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10162773)
1. The ethics of randomised controlled trials: a matter of statistical belief?
Hutton JL
Health Care Anal; 1996 May; 4(2):95-102. PubMed ID: 10162773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Consent to clinical research--adequately voluntary or substantially influenced?
Hewlett S
J Med Ethics; 1996 Aug; 22(4):232-7. PubMed ID: 8863149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Indifference of subjects: an alternative to equipoise in randomized clinical trials.
Veatch RM
Soc Philos Policy; 2002; 19(2):295-323. PubMed ID: 12678091
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Ethics of consent for babies in randomised clinical trials.
Meran JG
Lancet; 1995 May; 345(8961):1370. PubMed ID: 7752778
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Ethics and statistical methodology in clinical trials.
Palmer CR
J Med Ethics; 1993 Dec; 19(4):219-22. PubMed ID: 8308877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is informed consent always necessary for randomized, controlled trials?
Carome MA
N Engl J Med; 1999 Aug; 341(6):448-9; author reply 450. PubMed ID: 10438260
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Offering patients entry in clinical trials: preliminary study of the views of prospective participants.
Corbett F; Oldham J; Lilford R
J Med Ethics; 1996 Aug; 22(4):227-31. PubMed ID: 8863148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Study of cohort-specific consent and patient control in phase I cancer trials.
Daugherty CK; Ratain MJ; Minami H; Banik DM; Vogelzang NJ; Stadler WM; Siegler M
J Clin Oncol; 1998 Jul; 16(7):2305-12. PubMed ID: 9667244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Individual autonomy and the double-blind controlled experiment: the case of desperate volunteers.
Minogue BP; Palmer-Fernandez G; Udell L; Waller BN
J Med Philos; 1995 Feb; 20(1):43-55. PubMed ID: 7738458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A desperate solution: individual autonomy and the double-blind controlled experiment.
Logue G; Wear S
J Med Philos; 1995 Feb; 20(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 7738459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ethics and placebo-controlled thrombolytic trials: the future.
Freedman B
Coron Artery Dis; 1991 Sep; 2(7):849-52. PubMed ID: 11659532
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Is informed consent always necessary for randomized, controlled trials?
Truog RD; Robinson W; Randolph A; Morris A
N Engl J Med; 1999 Mar; 340(10):804-7. PubMed ID: 10072420
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of therapeutic research on informed consent and the ethics of clinical trials: a medical oncology perspective.
Daugherty CK
J Clin Oncol; 1999 May; 17(5):1601-17. PubMed ID: 10334550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Placebo-controlled trials.
Markman M
Ann Intern Med; 2001 Jul; 135(1):63-4. PubMed ID: 11434741
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The ethics of randomised controlled trials from the perspectives of patients, the public, and healthcare professionals.
Edwards SJ; Lilford RJ; Hewison J
BMJ; 1998 Oct; 317(7167):1209-12. PubMed ID: 9794861
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The ethical problems with sham surgery in clinical research.
Macklin R
N Engl J Med; 1999 Sep; 341(13):992-6. PubMed ID: 10498498
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Equipoise as a means of managing uncertainty: personal, communal and proxy.
Alderson P
J Med Ethics; 1996 Jun; 22(3):135-9. PubMed ID: 8798934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Randomized clinical trials: is periodontal research good for patients?
Williams KB; Glaros A; Walker MP; Cobb CM
Periodontol 2000; 2012 Jun; 59(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 22507058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Randomised consent designs in cancer clinical trials.
Altman DG; Whitehead J; Parmar MK; Stenning SP; Fayers PM; Machin D
Eur J Cancer; 1995 Nov; 31A(12):1934-44. PubMed ID: 8562145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A problem for achieving informed choice.
La Caze A
Theor Med Bioeth; 2008; 29(4):255-65. PubMed ID: 18802785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
