BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10163509)

  • 1. Effect of HA coating on the long-term survival of dental implant: a review of the literature.
    Kido H; Saha S
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 1996; 6(2):119-33. PubMed ID: 10163509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Survival of hydroxyapatite-coated implants: a meta-analytic review.
    Lee JJ; Rouhfar L; Beirne OR
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2000 Dec; 58(12):1372-9; discussion 1379-80. PubMed ID: 11117685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Marginal bone loss pattern around hydroxyapatite-coated versus commercially pure titanium implants after up to 12 years of follow-up.
    Schwartz-Arad D; Mardinger O; Levin L; Kozlovsky A; Hirshberg A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(2):238-44. PubMed ID: 15839117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of hydroxyapatite (HA) -coated threaded, HA-coated cylindric, and titanium threaded endosseous dental implants.
    Jeffcoat MK; McGlumphy EA; Reddy MS; Geurs NC; Proskin HM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):406-10. PubMed ID: 12814316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prospective study of 429 hydroxyapatite-coated cylindric omniloc implants placed in 121 patients.
    McGlumphy EA; Peterson LJ; Larsen PE; Jeffcoat MK
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(1):82-92. PubMed ID: 12608673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of the bone response around a hydroxyapatite-coated implant retrieved after 15 years.
    Iezzi G; Orlandi S; Pecora G; Piattelli A
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2009 Feb; 29(1):99-105. PubMed ID: 19244887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of 3 different endosseous nonsubmerged implants in edentulous mandibles: a clinical report.
    Røynesdal AK; Ambjørnsen E; Haanaes HR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(4):543-8. PubMed ID: 10453670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Long-term evaluation of implant survival in augmented sinuses: a case series.
    Yamamichi N; Itose T; Neiva R; Wang HL
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2008 Apr; 28(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 18546812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of surface macrotexture on the mechanical and histologic characteristics of hydroxylapatite-coated dental implants.
    Cook SD; Salkeld SL; Gaisser DM; Wagner WR
    J Oral Implantol; 1993; 19(4):288-94. PubMed ID: 8007021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the clinical predictability of hydroxyapatite-coated endosseous dental implants: a review of the literature.
    Biesbrock AR; Edgerton M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1995; 10(6):712-20. PubMed ID: 8530174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A distinguishable observation between survival and success rate outcome of hydroxyapatite-coated implants in 5-10 years in function.
    Artzi Z; Carmeli G; Kozlovsky A
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Feb; 17(1):85-93. PubMed ID: 16441789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Histologic analysis of a fractured implant: a case report.
    Brunel G; Armand S; Miller N; Rue J
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2000 Oct; 20(5):520-6. PubMed ID: 11203589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Human histologic and histomorphometric analyses of hydroxyapatite-coated implants after 10 years of function: a case report.
    Trisi P; Keith DJ; Rocco S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(1):124-30. PubMed ID: 15747684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of a thin HA coating on the stress/strain distribution in bone around dental implants using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Aoki H; Ozeki K; Ohtani Y; Fukui Y; Asaoka T
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2006; 16(3):157-69. PubMed ID: 16518015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of coating thickness and its material on the stress distribution for dental implants.
    Hedia HS
    J Med Eng Technol; 2007; 31(4):280-7. PubMed ID: 17566931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of implant geometry and surface characteristics on progressive osseointegration.
    Geurs NC; Jeffcoat RL; McGlumphy EA; Reddy MS; Jeffcoat MK
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(6):811-5. PubMed ID: 12507240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vivo evaluation of hydroxyapatite coatings of different crystallinities.
    Oh S; Tobin E; Yang Y; Carnes DL; Ong JL
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(5):726-31. PubMed ID: 16274146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Long-term experience with the combined ARBOND hydroxyapatite coating in implant osteointegration].
    Landor I; Vavrík P; Jahoda D; Pokorný D; Ballay R; Sosna A
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Jun; 76(3):172-8. PubMed ID: 19595277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biological performance of chemical hydroxyapatite coating associated with implant surface modification by laser beam: biomechanical study in rabbit tibias.
    Faeda RS; Tavares HS; Sartori R; Guastaldi AC; Marcantonio E
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1706-15. PubMed ID: 19615586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Long-term follow-up of hydroxyapatite-coated dental implants--a clinical trial.
    Binahmed A; Stoykewych A; Hussain A; Love B; Pruthi V
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):963-8. PubMed ID: 18271378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.