105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10163509)
21. Histologic evaluation of hydroxyapatite-coated root-form implant retrieved after 7 years in function: a case report.
Proussaefs PT; Tatakis DN; Lozada J; Caplanis N; Rohrer MD
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(3):438-43. PubMed ID: 10874811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite coatings and zirconia-reinforced hydroxyapatite composite coatings: in vivo study.
Lee TM; Yang CY; Chang E; Tsai RS
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2004 Dec; 71(4):652-60. PubMed ID: 15505828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Postmortem histologic evaluation of mandibular titanium and maxillary hydroxyapatite-coated implants from 1 patient.
Rohrer MD; Sobczak RR; Prasad HS; Morris HF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(4):579-86. PubMed ID: 10453675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Biomimetic calcium phosphate composite coating of dental implants.
Schliephake H; Scharnweber D; Roesseler S; Dard M; Sewing A; Aref A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):738-46. PubMed ID: 17066635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The effect of three different calcium phosphate implant coatings on bone deposition and coating resorption: a long-term histological study in sheep.
Schopper C; Moser D; Goriwoda W; Ziya-Ghazvini F; Spassova E; Lagogiannis G; Auterith A; Ewers R
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Jun; 16(3):357-68. PubMed ID: 15877757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Design optimization of functionally graded dental implant.
Hedia HS; Mahmoud NA
Biomed Mater Eng; 2004; 14(2):133-43. PubMed ID: 15156104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A long-term retrospective study of two different implant surfaces placed after reconstruction of the severely resorbed maxilla using Le Fort I osteotomy and interpositional bone grafting.
Marchetti C; Pieri F; Corinaldesi G; Degidi M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(5):911-8. PubMed ID: 19014162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Rapid bone resorption adjacent to hydroxyapatite-coated implants.
Ichikawa T; Hirota K; Kanitani H; Wigianto R; Kawamoto N; Matsumoto N; Miyake Y
J Oral Implantol; 1996; 22(3-4):232-5. PubMed ID: 9524500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Osseointegration of a hydroxyapatite-coated multilayered mesh stem.
Kusakabe H; Sakamaki T; Nihei K; Oyama Y; Yanagimoto S; Ichimiya M; Kimura J; Toyama Y
Biomaterials; 2004 Jul; 25(15):2957-69. PubMed ID: 14967528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Analysis of HA-coated subperiosteal implants.
Minichetti JC
J Oral Implantol; 2003; 29(3):111-6; discussion 117-9. PubMed ID: 12837050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Fate of the HA coating of loaded implants in the augmented sinus floor: a human case study of retrieved implants.
de Lange G; Tadjoedin E
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2002 Jun; 22(3):287-96. PubMed ID: 12186351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Cylindrical HA-coated implants--8-year observations.
Block MS; Kent JN
Compend Suppl; 1993; (15):S526-32; quiz S565-6. PubMed ID: 8187137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Variability of hydroxyapatite-coated dental implants.
Gross KA; Berndt CC; Iacono VJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(5):601-10. PubMed ID: 9796143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Characterization of the surface properties of commercially available dental implants using scanning electron microscopy, focused ion beam, and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy.
Jarmar T; Palmquist A; Brånemark R; Hermansson L; Engqvist H; Thomsen P
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 Mar; 10(1):11-22. PubMed ID: 18254738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Histomorphometric analyses of bone interface with titanium-aluminum-vanadium and hydroxyapatite-coated implants by biomimetic process.
Zagury R; Harari ND; Conz MB; Soares Gde A; Vidigal GM
Implant Dent; 2007 Sep; 16(3):290-6. PubMed ID: 17846545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Histologic and histomorphometric comparison of immediately placed hydroxyapatite-coated and titanium plasma-sprayed implants: a pilot study in dogs.
Karabuda C; Sandalli P; Yalcin S; Steflik DE; Parr GR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(4):510-5. PubMed ID: 10453665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Bone response to titanium implants coated with thin sputtered HA film subject to hydrothermal treatment and implanted in the canine mandible.
Ozeki K; Okuyama Y; Fukui Y; Aoki H
Biomed Mater Eng; 2006; 16(4):243-51. PubMed ID: 16971742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. HA coatings in implant dentistry: hype, hysteria, or clinical reality?
Zablotsky M
J Dent Symp; 1993 Aug; 1():70-2. PubMed ID: 8186845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A seven-year clinical evaluation of soft-tissue effects of hydroxylapatite-coated vs. uncoated subperiosteal implants.
Fettig RH; Kay JF
J Oral Implantol; 1994; 20(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 7932855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Bone response to plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite and radiofrequency-sputtered calcium phosphate implants in vivo.
Ong JL; Bessho K; Carnes DL
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(4):581-6. PubMed ID: 12182302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
