144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10163866)
1. A GUI (graphic user interface) glue: customized software interfaces hold an HMO's information system together.
Edlin M
Health Manag Technol; 1996 Dec; 17(13):20-2, 24. PubMed ID: 10163866
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Show data warehouse benefits to end users.
Braly D
Health Manag Technol; 1995 Oct; 16(11):22-4. PubMed ID: 10151630
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. At Kaiser, a vision of the connected future.
Walker LM
Med Econ; 2002 Feb; 79(3):52-4, 58. PubMed ID: 11859789
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Computer "advice" aids in managing care of a population.
Payne TH; Savarino JE
HMO Pract; 1993 Jun; 7(2):73-4. PubMed ID: 10126685
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Easing the transfer of data.
Schuerenberg BK
Health Data Manag; 2008 Aug; 16(8):59-60. PubMed ID: 18717135
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Kaiser Permanente of Ohio's Encounter System.
Khoury AT
Med Interface; 1994 Jan; 7(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 10131625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Why Blue Cross is setting up new HMOs.
Marino WJ
J Health Care Benefits; 1994; 4(1):50-2. PubMed ID: 10137546
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. MARS (medical automated record system) attacks Cleveland. Award-winning system breaks through implementation barriers.
Khoury A
Healthc Inform; 1998 Feb; 15(2):213-5. PubMed ID: 10177678
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Medical group practice information needs in a changing health care environment.
Blevins JV; Johnson LA; Monson AL
Healthc Inf Manage; 1996; 10(3):35-41. PubMed ID: 10163170
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. No silver bullets.
O'Connor K
HMO; 1995; 36(6):52-8. PubMed ID: 10153448
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [The optimal design of the interface system between the hospital & the medical insurance institution].
Yang J
Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2005 May; 29(3):222-4. PubMed ID: 16124638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Insuring satisfaction. Health plans are steadily upgrading their customer relationship management capabilities.
Hagland M
Healthc Inform; 2003 Jul; 20(7):26-8, 30. PubMed ID: 12899059
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Deploying an HMO's data warehouse.
Hollis J
Health Manag Technol; 1998 Jul; 19(8):46-8. PubMed ID: 10181225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The recovery of Bay State Health Care.
Maltz DL
Med Interface; 1994 Mar; 7(3):115-6, 119-20. PubMed ID: 10133054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Lessons learned through hospital involvement in HMO.
Burns LA
Hospitals; 1979 Aug; 53(16):73-7. PubMed ID: 457063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Planning for the future: the implementation of an automated clinical system.
Poole HK; Wilson G; Davis L; Mason AH
Caring; 1995 Aug; 14(8):24, 26, 28-32. PubMed ID: 10151215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Successful implementation of a comprehensive computer-based patient record system in Kaiser Permanente Northwest: strategy and experience.
Chin HL; Krall MA
Eff Clin Pract; 1998; 1(2):51-60. PubMed ID: 10187223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computerized records gain ground.
O'Connor K
Infocare; 1997; ():22, 24-5. PubMed ID: 10167723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Software becomes hands-on.
Cross M
Health Data Manag; 2007 Jun; 15(6):55-6. PubMed ID: 17580791
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Support of quality and business goals by an ambulatory automated medical record system in Kaiser Permanente of Ohio.
Khoury AT
Eff Clin Pract; 1998; 1(2):73-82. PubMed ID: 10187226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
