These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10163922)

  • 21. A second opinion on PROS.
    Weissenstein E
    Mod Healthc; 1994 May; 24(19):45-6, 48, 50. PubMed ID: 10133800
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Peer review of HMOs is here--or is it?
    Kirchner M
    Med Econ; 1988 Oct; 65(19):99-101, 104-5. PubMed ID: 10288977
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. New Jersey's case for local control of the Medicare review process.
    Kingsley DI; Rodi A
    N J Med; 1992 Jul; 89(7):527-8. PubMed ID: 1305270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. PROs and poor quality medical care--they can't sanction it until they define it!
    Chenen AR
    Med Staff Couns; 1988; 2(2):25-33. PubMed ID: 10302314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Documenting for "PROs".
    Raymond L
    Nursing; 2002 Mar; 32(3):50-3. PubMed ID: 11902046
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Shift in priorities. Facing budget cuts, QIOs (Quality Improvement Organizations) to trim hospital services.
    Lovern E
    Mod Healthc; 2002 Feb; 32(8):17-8. PubMed ID: 11913037
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Taking the PROs down a new road to quality. Interview by C. Burns Roehrig.
    Jencks SF
    Internist; 1992 Oct; 33(9):20-3. PubMed ID: 10121373
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. PRO update. Transition from the third to fourth scope of work.
    Baker NA
    Mich Med; 1992 Apr; 91(4):42, 45-7. PubMed ID: 1614338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. External factors will affect quality assurance in the '80s.
    Blanton WB
    Hosp Peer Rev; 1982 Jan; 7(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 10289325
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. PROs emerge as rich source for indicators.
    Hosp Peer Rev; 1996 Oct; 21(10):131-2. PubMed ID: 10161739
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Physicians and the PROs' third scope of work.
    Gosfield AG
    Med Staff Couns; 1989; 3(4):1-10. PubMed ID: 10303854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. PROs make us waste time and money.
    Gambrell TR
    Med Econ; 1992 Jun; 69(12):29, 32-3, 36-7. PubMed ID: 10118826
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The evolving scope of PROs. Interview by Jane Stein.
    Weiser RR
    Bus Health; 1987 Nov; 5(1):46-8. PubMed ID: 10284429
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Medicare's peer review organizations. Renewed emphasis on quality of patient care.
    Sheehy TJ
    Resid Staff Physician; 1988 Apr; 34(4):63-5, 68-9. PubMed ID: 10302358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Overhauling Medicare's quality assurance program.
    Frank KM
    Nurs Econ; 1990; 8(2):68, 82. PubMed ID: 2184373
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Auditors will provide employers and consumers with quality data.
    Johnson DE
    Contract Healthc; 1988 Aug; ():35. PubMed ID: 10290630
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Quality assurance: achieving compliance with home care regulations.
    Berhand-Doggett J; Lowenstein A
    Caring; 1991 Oct; 10(10):37-40, 42-3. PubMed ID: 10114388
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Quality Assurance Act could 'watch' HHAs.
    Home Health J; 1986 Mar; 7(3):4, 8. PubMed ID: 10300707
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Increased scrutiny, expanded role ahead for PROs.
    Mowll CA
    Healthc Financ Manage; 1989 May; 43(5):16, 20, 22. PubMed ID: 10303377
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Will physician peer review succeed?
    Pierson RN
    Internist; 1986 Jul; 27(6):13-4. PubMed ID: 10301022
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.