These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10164043)
21. Abortion in the United States, 1977-1978. Forrest JD; Sullivan E; Tietze C Fam Plann Perspect; 1979; 11(6):329-41. PubMed ID: 401078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Abortion on demand in a post-Wade context: must the state pay the bills? Fordham Law Rev; 1973; 41(4):921-44. PubMed ID: 11661025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Providing controversial health care: abortion services since 1973. Forrest JD; Henshaw SK Womens Health Issues; 1993; 3(3):152-7. PubMed ID: 8274870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Impact of publicly funded contraceptive services on unintended pregnancies and implications for Medicaid expenditures. Forrest JD; Samara R Fam Plann Perspect; 1996; 28(5):188-95. PubMed ID: 8886761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Family planning issues relating to maternal and infant mortality in the United States. Puffer RR Bull Pan Am Health Organ; 1993; 27(2):120-34. PubMed ID: 8339110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. States rebel against Federal abortion orders. Kent C; Tokarski C J Am Health Policy; 1994; 4(2):6-7. PubMed ID: 10132602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Legal restrictions and complications of abortion: insights from data on complication rates in the United States. Rolnick JA; Vorhies JS J Public Health Policy; 2012 Aug; 33(3):348-62. PubMed ID: 22622483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The economics of abortion access in the US: restrictions on government funding for abortion is the post-Roe battleground. Fried MG Conscience; 2005-2006; 26(4):11-5. PubMed ID: 16619422 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The Supreme Court and abortion: 2. Sidestepping social realities. Mechanic D Hastings Cent Rep; 1980 Dec; 10(6):17-9. PubMed ID: 7007284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Teenage abortion and pregnancy statistics by state, 1992. Henshaw SK Fam Plann Perspect; 1997; 29(3):115-22. PubMed ID: 9179580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The Medicaid cutoff and abortion services for the poor. Henshaw SK; Wallisch LS Fam Plann Perspect; 1984; 16(4):171-2, 177-80. PubMed ID: 6386517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The laws that affect abortion in the United States and their impact on women's health. Harrison LK; Naylor KL Nurse Pract; 1991 Dec; 16(12):53-9. PubMed ID: 1798604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The Hyde Amendment and the future. Rosoff JI Fam Plann Perspect; 1980; 12(4):172. PubMed ID: 7002585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The fiscal impact of the Medicaid abortion funding ban in Michigan. Evans MI; Gleicher E; Feingold E; Johnson MP; Sokol RJ Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Oct; 82(4 Pt 1):555-60. PubMed ID: 8135922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Pennsylvania's birth rates after Medicaid abortion restrictions. Kahn EM Am J Public Health; 1993 Jun; 83(6):911-2. PubMed ID: 8498637 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. The potential impact of improvements in contraception on fertility and abortion in Western countries. Westoff CF; Hammerslough CR; Paul L Eur J Popul; 1987 Nov; 3(1):7-32. PubMed ID: 12280731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The Supreme Court and abortion: the irrelevance of medical judgment. Annas GJ Hastings Cent Rep; 1980 Oct; 10(5):23-4. PubMed ID: 7002867 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The relationship between restrictive state abortion laws and postpartum depression. Medoff MH Soc Work Public Health; 2014; 29(5):481-90. PubMed ID: 25068613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]