135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10164049)
1. The cytology proficiency dilemma: the case for computer-based testing.
Quarngesser SS
Am Clin Lab; 1996; 15(10):18. PubMed ID: 10164049
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Recommendations that could improve performance of colposcopy and cytology.
Dina R
Cytopathology; 2008 Dec; 19(6):338-40. PubMed ID: 19040544
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Maryland's cytology labs: 1989-90 proficiency testing results.
DeBoy JM; Jarboe BR
Md Med J; 1991 Feb; 40(2):107-11. PubMed ID: 1847738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. With an eye toward patient care.
Selvaggi SM
Diagn Cytopathol; 2004 Apr; 30(4):217-9. PubMed ID: 15048953
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Regulatory closure of cervical cytology laboratories: recommendations for a public health response.
MMWR Recomm Rep; 1997 Dec; 46(RR-17):1-19. PubMed ID: 9409538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Interobserver reproducibility: a new approach to quality control by using digital images (D.I. Test).
Cariaggi MP; Confortini M; Mirri F; Tinacci G
Acta Cytol; 2001; 45(3):488-90. PubMed ID: 11393094
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Re: using a quality control approach to define an 'adequately cellular' liquid-based cervical cytology specimen.
Evered A
Cytopathology; 2007 Oct; 18(5):325-6; author reply 326. PubMed ID: 17883693
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Personal performance profiles: a useful adjunct to quality assurance in cervical cytology.
Heatley MK
Cytopathology; 1999 Feb; 10(1):66. PubMed ID: 10068890
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Toward objective quality assurance: the eyes don't have it.
Stoler MH
Am J Clin Pathol; 2002 Apr; 117(4):520-2. PubMed ID: 11939724
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [The cervico-vaginal smear. What is new with the Papanicolaou method in 1996?].
Marsan C
Bull Acad Natl Med; 1996 May; 180(5):1115-9; discussion 1120-4. PubMed ID: 8963710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. How should adequacy of liquid-based cytology be defined?
Desai M; Herbert A
Cytopathology; 2006 Aug; 17(4):165-7. PubMed ID: 16879262
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Recent developments in cervical cancer control.
Kurtycz DF; Shalkham JE
WMJ; 2003; 102(6):51-5. PubMed ID: 14658569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. American Society for Cytotechnology quality assurance survey data. Summary report.
Ashton PR
Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(4):451-4. PubMed ID: 2750434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Recommendations for quality control of cervico-vaginal cytology].
GISCi, Gruppo Italiano Screening del Cervicocarcinoma
Epidemiol Prev; 2004; 28(1 Suppl):1-16. PubMed ID: 15202448
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of reporting endocervical component adequacy--a continuous quality improvement project.
Roberson J; Connolly K; St John K; Eltoum I; Chhieng DC
Diagn Cytopathol; 2002 Sep; 27(3):181-4. PubMed ID: 12203868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. New technologies in gynecologic cytology.
Bishop JW; Marshall CJ; Bentz JS
J Reprod Med; 2000 Sep; 45(9):701-19. PubMed ID: 11027079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Those gland problems in cervical cytology: faith or fact? Observations from the Bethesda 2001 terminology conference.
Moriarty AT; Wilbur D
Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Apr; 28(4):171-4. PubMed ID: 12672090
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Quality assessment in the age of machine-aided cervical cytology screening.
Renshaw AA
Cancer; 2004 Dec; 102(6):345-7. PubMed ID: 15540251
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Cytopathology in the 21st century.
Williams C; Rosenthal DL
Am J Clin Pathol; 1993 Apr; 99(4 Suppl 1):S31-3. PubMed ID: 8386435
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Advances in cervical screening technology.
Stoler MH
Mod Pathol; 2000 Mar; 13(3):275-84. PubMed ID: 10757338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
