132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10164084)
1. Ireland's competent authority initiatives.
Scully C
Stud Health Technol Inform; 1996; 28():101-11. PubMed ID: 10164084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Germany's competent authority initiatives.
Stober W
Stud Health Technol Inform; 1996; 28():96-100. PubMed ID: 10164095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Activities in other European countries.
Ecker W; De Roo R; Frellsen M; Gomes AF; Gutowski R
Stud Health Technol Inform; 1996; 28():119-23. PubMed ID: 10164088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Spain's competent authority initiatives.
Luna CA
Stud Health Technol Inform; 1996; 28():112-5. PubMed ID: 10164086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Finland's competent authority initiatives.
Pommelin P
Stud Health Technol Inform; 1996; 28():89-92. PubMed ID: 10164093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. User reporting systems.
Donawa ME
Med Device Technol; 1997 Dec; 8(10):10-2. PubMed ID: 10176361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. France's competent authority initiatives.
Jullian E
Stud Health Technol Inform; 1996; 28():93-5. PubMed ID: 10164094
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Medical devices vigilance: the European approach.
Freeman MF
Stud Health Technol Inform; 1996; 28():13-6. PubMed ID: 10172826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sweden's competent authority initiatives.
Liedstrom G
Stud Health Technol Inform; 1996; 28():116-8. PubMed ID: 10164087
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The Netherlands' competent authority activities.
de Vries A
Stud Health Technol Inform; 1996; 28():106-11. PubMed ID: 10164085
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Implementing new European vigilance procedures.
Donawa M
Med Device Technol; 2007; 18(7):34, 36-7. PubMed ID: 18075133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. National handling of medical devices vigilance reports and the use of registers.
Nordan J
Stud Health Technol Inform; 1996; 28():144-7. PubMed ID: 10172834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Preparing for more active market surveillance.
Donawa M
Med Device Technol; 2005 May; 16(4):30-3. PubMed ID: 15941197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quality analysis of medical device vigilance reports.
Sievänen H; Pommelin P
Technol Health Care; 2003; 11(4):275-81. PubMed ID: 14600338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Requirements specification for a harmonized medical device vigilance information exchange system.
Vassilacopoulos G
Stud Health Technol Inform; 1996; 28():39-44. PubMed ID: 10172829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Update on the European database.
Donawa M
Med Device Technol; 2001 Oct; 12(8):21-4. PubMed ID: 12938545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Proposed amendments to the medical devices Directives.
Donawa M
Med Device Technol; 2006; 17(1):22-5. PubMed ID: 16483107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The EUROMEDIES EDI prototype system.
Pramataris K; Doukidis G; Giaglis G; Raptakis J
Stud Health Technol Inform; 1996; 28():62-8. PubMed ID: 10172831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. User reporting of medical device related incidents.
Sievänen H
Med Device Technol; 2003 May; 14(4):26-9. PubMed ID: 12774575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. European requirements for product returns.
Donawa M
Med Device Technol; 2005 Nov; 16(9):28-31. PubMed ID: 16438446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
