87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10164209)
1. Conceptions and misconceptions.
Davidson SN
Healthc Forum J; 1997; 40(1):58-61. PubMed ID: 10164209
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. New techniques deployed against infertility.
Scott L
Mod Healthc; 1995 Jul; 25(28):52, 54. PubMed ID: 10143952
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Contraceptive technologies: how much choice do we really have?
Fishel J
ZPG Report; 1997; 29(2):4-6. PubMed ID: 12293118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fertility regulation technology: status and prospects.
Segal SJ; Nordberg OS
Popul Bull; 1977 Mar; 31(6):1-25. PubMed ID: 12335682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Abortion and the Pied Piper of compromise.
Clark AE
N Y Univ Law Rev; 1993 May; 68(2):265-329. PubMed ID: 11656365
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Resolution: RU 486.
American Association for the Advancement of Science
Science; 1991 Apr; 252(5005):587. PubMed ID: 11642875
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Bio-medical aspects of fertility control.
Schearer SB
Part J; 1972 Mar; 6(8):15-8. PubMed ID: 12179383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Contraceptive research: still inadequate after all these years?
Diconsiglio JM
Family Plan World; 1992; 2(6):14. PubMed ID: 12344623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Webster, privacy, and RU486.
Haas EM
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1990; 6():277-96. PubMed ID: 11645679
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Infertility.
Ismach JM
Med World News; 1983 Dec; 24(23):54-60, 69-73, 76-8. PubMed ID: 10273429
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical applications of mifepristone.
Tang OS; Ho PC
Gynecol Endocrinol; 2006 Dec; 22(12):655-9. PubMed ID: 17162706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Contraceptive failure rates: new estimates from the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth.
Fu H; Darroch JE; Haas T; Ranjit N
Fam Plann Perspect; 1999; 31(2):56-63. PubMed ID: 10224543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Abortion politics, science, and research ethics: take down the wall of separation.
Fletcher JC
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1992; 8():95-121. PubMed ID: 11645741
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Medical abortion practices: a survey of National Abortion Federation members in the United States.
Wiegerinck MM; Jones HE; O'Connell K; Lichtenberg ES; Paul M; Westhoff CL
Contraception; 2008 Dec; 78(6):486-91. PubMed ID: 19014795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Can mifepristone medical abortion be simplified? A review of the evidence and questions for future research.
Clark WH; Gold M; Grossman D; Winikoff B
Contraception; 2007 Apr; 75(4):245-50. PubMed ID: 17362700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A qualitative study of insurers' coverage for mifepristone-induced abortion.
Gemperli MP; Stewart FH; Phillips KA; Sakowski J; Van Bebber S; Bergthold L
Manag Care Interface; 2005 Mar; 18(3):26-30, 32. PubMed ID: 15816295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Confronting a new obstacle to reproductive choice: encouraging the development of RU-486 through reform of products liability law.
Rubin LA
Rev Law Soc Change; 1990-1991; 18(1):131-59. PubMed ID: 11656168
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The abortion cocktail.
Nathanson BN
First Things; 1996 Jan; 59():23-6. PubMed ID: 11656484
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of the environment on reproductive health.
International Workshop on the Impact of the Environment on Reproductive Health (1991: Copenhagen)
Prog Hum Reprod Res; 1991; (20):1-11. PubMed ID: 12285819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. American abortion law applied to new reproductive technology.
Hemphill L
Jurimetrics; 1992; 32(3):361-86. PubMed ID: 11656220
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
