500 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10164517)
1. Rights of the terminally ill patient.
Hodgson J
Ann Health Law; 1996; (5):169-91. PubMed ID: 10164517
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The duty to care--the right to refuse. Changing roles of patients and physicians in end-of-life decision making.
Garwin M
J Leg Med; 1998 Mar; 19(1):99-125. PubMed ID: 9564096
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Substitute consent. Reconciling negative treatment and consent to routine medical treatment.
Sappington GM
J Leg Med; 1986 Sep; 7(3):341-55. PubMed ID: 3490528
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Death with dignity: implementing one's right to die.
Zaremba JF
Univ Detroit Law Rev; 1987; 64(3):557-77. PubMed ID: 11651900
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The right to die: progress and peril.
Capron AM
Euthan Rev; 1987; 2(1 2):41-59. PubMed ID: 11649218
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The alleged peril of active voluntary euthanasia: a reply to Alexander Morgan Capron.
Kuhse H
Euthan Rev; 1987; 2(1 2):60-75. PubMed ID: 11649219
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Silent decisions: limits of consent and the terminally ill patient.
Brennan TA
Law Med Health Care; 1988; 16(3-4):204-9. PubMed ID: 3205051
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. From a Dutch perspective: response to "Rights of the Terminally Ill Act of the Australian Northern Territory" by Robert L. Schwartz (CQ vol 5, no 1).
Kimsma GK; van Leeuwen E
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1996; 5(2):278-80. PubMed ID: 8718735
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. House of Lords debates assisted dying.
Bull Med Ethics; 2003 Apr; (187):7-10. PubMed ID: 14983858
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Active euthanasia: can it be justified?
Molenda FA
Euthan Rev; 1988; 3(1):15-43. PubMed ID: 11649265
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The legal aspects of medical euthanasia.
Meyers DW
Bioscience; 1973 Aug; 23(8):467-70. PubMed ID: 11660863
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Mental incapacity: some proposals for legislative reform.
McHale JV
J Med Ethics; 1998 Oct; 24(5):322-7. PubMed ID: 9800588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Selective nontreatment of handicapped newborns: an analysis.
Crossley MA
Med Law; 1987; 6(6):499-524. PubMed ID: 2959834
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. On euthanasia and other medical decisions in the terminal care of dementia patients.
Helme T
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry; 1995 Sep; 10(9):727-33. PubMed ID: 11656578
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The "small beginnings" of euthanasia: examining the erosion in legal prohibitions against mercy-killing.
Koop CE; Grant ER
Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 1986; 2(3):585-634. PubMed ID: 11650885
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Withdrawing medical treatment: implications of the Bland case.
Tribe D; Korgaonkar G
Br J Hosp Med; 1992 Dec 2-1993 Jan 5; 48(11):754-6. PubMed ID: 1467821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ethical and legal issues in palliative care.
Rousseau P
Prim Care; 2001 Jun; 28(2):391-400. PubMed ID: 11406442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The law regarding assisted dying for the terminally ill in the UK.
Dimond B
Int J Palliat Nurs; 2005 Nov; 11(11):582-3; discussion 584. PubMed ID: 16471045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Medical treatment rights of older persons and persons with disabilities: 1993-94 developments.
Avila D
Issues Law Med; 1995; 10(4):385-400. PubMed ID: 7737846
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Discontinuing nutrition support: a review of the case law.
Dresser R
J Am Diet Assoc; 1985 Oct; 85(10):1289-92. PubMed ID: 3930592
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
