226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10166108)
21. The ORYX initiative: goals and potential application to physician quality improvement efforts.
Hanold LS; Koss RG; Loeb JM
Tex Med; 2000 Oct; 96(10):84-7. PubMed ID: 11070741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. ORYX is right around the corner; is your department ready?
Hosp Case Manag; 1997 Sep; 5(9):153-5. PubMed ID: 10173868
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Understanding JCAHO's latest PI (performance improvement) revisions.
Homa-Lowry J
Hosp Case Manag; 1998 Jul; 6(7):141-2, 147-8. PubMed ID: 10181274
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. JCAHO's Agenda for Change will make patient outcomes a board priority.
Weisman E
Trustee; 1992 Dec; 45(12):12-4. PubMed ID: 10122632
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Living with the JCAHO's IM initiatives.
Glaser JP
Healthc Inf Manage; 1994; 8(2):3-4. PubMed ID: 10135915
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Data to help JCAHO pinpoint problem areas.
Gardner E
Mod Healthc; 1992 Jun; 22(26):30. PubMed ID: 10118668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The accreditation process: an update on the Joint Commission on the Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations.
Ky Hosp Mag; 1995; 13(1):6-8. PubMed ID: 10144079
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. JCAHO's proposal to reveal quality offenders a timely one.
Bell CW
Mod Healthc; 1989 Jan; 19(4):16. PubMed ID: 10291658
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. JCAHO's one concession: will start doing truly unannounced surveys.
Hosp Peer Rev; 1999 Oct; 24(10):149-50, 152-3. PubMed ID: 10621279
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Candid discussion is aim of JCAHO's CEO exit conference.
Koska MT
Hospitals; 1990 Apr; 64(8):114, 116. PubMed ID: 2323750
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Oryx gears up. JCAHO outcomes measurement plan causes few ripples.
Moore JD
Mod Healthc; 1997 Mar; 27(9):17, 20, 22. PubMed ID: 10165064
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The ORYX program: beginning a new era in performance measurement.
Health Care Food Nutr Focus; 1997 Nov; 14(3):1, 3-4. PubMed ID: 10175263
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Data dispute continues. Hospital groups question JCAHO's use of information.
Conn J
Mod Healthc; 2005 Oct; 35(43):8-10. PubMed ID: 16276742
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. New year, 'new pathways'. Are you ready for the JCAHO's new survey process?
McLaughlin S
Health Facil Manage; 2004 Jan; 17(1):39-41. PubMed ID: 14750343
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Ready to answer ORYX data questions? Here's what Joint Commission will ask.
ED Manag; 2000 Apr; 12(4):37-42. PubMed ID: 11067330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. ORYX. The next evolution in accreditation. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations.
Nurs Manage; 1997 May; 28(5):49-52, 54. PubMed ID: 9287797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Accreditation requirements for ORYX: the next evolution in accreditation.
Zeglen M
J AHIMA; 1997 Jun; 68(6):20-2, 24-31. PubMed ID: 10167799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Inspecting the inspectors: could JCAHO's deemed status face a threat?
Hosp Peer Rev; 1997 Aug; 22(8):109-12. PubMed ID: 10169280
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Gearing up for the JCAHO's new pain management standards: some hospitals are ahead of the game.
Sandrick K
Strateg Healthc Excell; 2000 May; 13(5):1-8. PubMed ID: 11009697
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Outcomes in action: the JCAHO's clinical indicators.
McCormick B
Hospitals; 1990 Oct; 64(19):34. PubMed ID: 2401492
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
