175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10166364)
1. Servicing: meeting US and European quality system requirements.
Donawa ME
Med Device Technol; 1997 Mar; 8(2):16-8, 20, 22. PubMed ID: 10166364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Meeting US and European supplier control requirements.
Donawa M
Med Device Technol; 2009; 20(3):24-7. PubMed ID: 19626952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Meeting European and US requirements for design and development documentation, Part II.
Donawa ME
Med Device Technol; 1996 Dec; 7(10):10-5. PubMed ID: 10164052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Avoiding surprises when implementing a single quality system.
Donawa M
Med Device Technol; 2009; 20(2):28, 30-1. PubMed ID: 19405340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Medical devices; current good manufacturing practice (CGMP) final fule; quality system regulation--FDA. Final rule.
Fed Regist; 1996 Oct; 61(195):52602-62. PubMed ID: 10168287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. European and US quality system requirements for packaging.
Donawa ME
Med Device Technol; 1997 May; 8(4):12-4, 16-7. PubMed ID: 10167684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Complying with US and European complaint handling requirements.
Donawa ME
Med Device Technol; 1997 Sep; 8(7):12-5. PubMed ID: 10174197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Understanding US labelling requirements.
Donawa M
Med Device Technol; 2005 Sep; 16(7):21-3. PubMed ID: 16259155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Complying with US and European change control requirements, Part I.
Donawa ME
Med Device Technol; 1997 Oct; 8(8):10-3. PubMed ID: 10174270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Differing definitions of manufacturer.
Donawa ME
Med Device Technol; 1998; 9(6):14-7. PubMed ID: 10182120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Complying with US and European change control requirements, Part II.
Donawa ME
Med Device Technol; 1997 Nov; 8(9):13-6. PubMed ID: 10174625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Controlling the quality of raw materials.
Donawa ME
Med Device Technol; 1998; 9(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 10176139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Addressing US and European device testing requirements.
Donawa M
Med Device Technol; 2008 Sep; 19(5):32, 34-7. PubMed ID: 18947148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Meeting European and US requirements for design and development documentation, Part I.
Donawa ME
Med Device Technol; 1996 Nov; 7(9):12-5. PubMed ID: 10163673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The quality planning conundrum.
Donawa ME
Med Device Technol; 1999; 10(6):14-6. PubMed ID: 10623345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Process validation: harmonizing the requirements.
Donawa ME
Med Device Technol; 1998 Oct; 9(8):13-6. PubMed ID: 10186986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Taking control: the Validation Master Plan.
Donawa ME
Med Device Technol; 1995 Dec; 6(10):12-4. PubMed ID: 10158118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Medical device reporting: another final rule, Part I.
Donawa M
Med Device Technol; 2000 Mar; 11(2):40-2. PubMed ID: 10915493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. New US agent requirements.
Donawa M
Med Device Technol; 2002; 13(1):35-7. PubMed ID: 11921780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The impact of the new quality management system standards on the CE-marking process.
Donawa M
Med Device Technol; 2001; 12(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 11317864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
