246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10166764)
1. "Agenda for Change" ends, enter ORYX.
QRC Advis; 1997 May; 13(7):8, 7. PubMed ID: 10166764
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Update on ORYX: the next evolution in accreditation.
Jt Comm Perspect; 1997; 17(5):15-30. PubMed ID: 10182300
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Special report--ORYX: the next evolution in accreditation. Joint Commission introduces new requirements to integrate performance measurement into accreditation process.
Jt Comm Perspect; 1997; 17(1):26-7, 29. PubMed ID: 10346346
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. ORYX: how will it affect you?
Hosp Peer Rev; 1997 Apr; 22(4):41-7. PubMed ID: 10166111
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Redesigned ORYX Performance Measure Reports updated four times a year.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2006 Mar; 26(3):9-12. PubMed ID: 16933569
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. JCAHO update. ORYX moves full speed ahead.
Health Care Food Nutr Focus; 2000 Apr; 16(8):10-2. PubMed ID: 10977709
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Should you consider ISO 9000?
Hosp Peer Rev; 1998 Jan; 23(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 10175807
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Showing improvement is a must for 1999 survey.
OR Manager; 1998 Dec; 14(12):1, 10. PubMed ID: 10187725
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The Joint Commission's agenda for change.
Ente BH
Curr Concepts Hosp Pharm Manage; 1989; 11(2):6-14. PubMed ID: 10293152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The next evolution in accreditation.
O'Leary DS
Jt Comm Perspect; 1996; 16(5):2-3. PubMed ID: 10166297
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. An assessment of accreditation with contingencies and the three-year award cycle.
Ente BH
QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1985 Mar; 11(3):93-6. PubMed ID: 3921895
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Ready to answer ORYX data questions? Here's what Joint Commission will ask.
ED Manag; 2000 Apr; 12(4):37-42. PubMed ID: 11067330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Change in the process for organizations in which their survey reports meet a rule for conditional accreditation or preliminary denial of accreditation decision.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Sep; 24(9):7. PubMed ID: 15484653
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. ORYX: the next evolution in accreditation.
Bender N
Ambul Outreach; 1998; ():23-4. PubMed ID: 10346585
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Gearing up for the new accreditation process. Revised Joint Commission standards for 2004.
Health Care Food Nutr Focus; 2003 Mar; 20(3):1, 3. PubMed ID: 12621703
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The ORYX initiative: goals and potential application to physician quality improvement efforts.
Hanold LS; Koss RG; Loeb JM
Tex Med; 2000 Oct; 96(10):84-7. PubMed ID: 11070741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Joint Commission launches Standards Improvement Initiative.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2006 Oct; 26(10):1. PubMed ID: 17139923
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. JCAHO to study closures.
Burda D
Mod Healthc; 1989 Sep; 19(38):6. PubMed ID: 10294772
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The Joint Commission's "Agenda for Change".
O'Leary DS
J Med Assoc Ga; 1987 Jul; 76(7):503-7. PubMed ID: 3476682
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Evidence helps organizations meet JCAHO leadership.
Dahl M
Health Care Food Nutr Focus; 2001 Jul; 17(11):8-10. PubMed ID: 11447897
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
