170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10167650)
21. Medicaid managed care: there's more for states to do.
Haslanger K; Tallon JR
Manag Care Q; 2004; 12(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 15495627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Can risk contracts help solve Medicaid budget crisis?
Capitation Rates Data; 2003 Mar; 8(3):25-7. PubMed ID: 12661325
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Alaska--warning up to managed care.
Kertesz L
Mod Healthc; 1994 Nov; 24(47):59-62, 66-8, 70-2. PubMed ID: 10138247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Principal-agent theory: a framework for improving health care reform in Tennessee.
Sekwat A
J Health Hum Serv Adm; 2000; 22(3):277-91. PubMed ID: 11010123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. States move ahead through incremental reforms.
White JH
Health Prog; 1994 Nov; 75(9):10-2, 24. PubMed ID: 10137943
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Oregon Medicaid plan expanding at rapid pace.
Kertesz L
Mod Healthc; 1994 Aug; 24(32):145. PubMed ID: 10135372
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. In California, Medi-Cal managed care is superior to Medi-Cal fee-for-service.
Bruno R; Gilbert BP
Manag Care Q; 1998; 6(4):7-14. PubMed ID: 10185780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Partner with state to shape programs that manage Medicaid special needs patients.
Public Sect Contract Rep; 1998 Oct; 4(10):152-5. PubMed ID: 10187168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Michigan Medicaid managed care expanding.
Cannon J
Mich Hosp; 1992; 28(3):11-3, 15. PubMed ID: 10117786
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Medicaid managed care in Maryland.
Benjamin GC
Md Med; 2000 Jan; 1(1):41-2. PubMed ID: 10896480
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Is this the hour of managed care? Lawmakers seem to think so.
Provider; 1995 Jun; 21(6):44-6, 48-50, 53-5. PubMed ID: 10143278
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. TennCare in crisis.
Ingram JJ
Tenn Med; 2005 Mar; 98(3):102-3. PubMed ID: 15974095
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Medicaid moving to managed care.
Wilson CN
Hosp Pharm; 1995 Mar; 30(3):214, 218-20. PubMed ID: 10140766
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Ill. hospitals wary of managed-care move.
Japsen B
Mod Healthc; 1996 Jul; 26(30):24. PubMed ID: 10158838
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. More states enrolling elderly and disabled persons in risk-based Medicaid managed care plans.
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 1997 Apr; 5(8):5. PubMed ID: 10172991
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. State Medicaid managed care enrollment: understanding the political calculus that drives Medicaid managed care reforms.
Pracht EE
J Health Polit Policy Law; 2007 Aug; 32(4):685-731. PubMed ID: 17639017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A tale of two states. Arizona and Tennessee reinvent Medicaid, but not without pain and perils.
Gleick E
Time; 1995 Dec; 146(25):31-2, 35-6. PubMed ID: 10172525
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Medicaid agencies as managed care organizations: an "actuarially sound" solution?
Spitz B
J Health Polit Policy Law; 2007 Jun; 32(3):379-413. PubMed ID: 17519472
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Perspectives. Risky business: Maryland's new Medicaid program.
MacPerson P
Faulkner Grays Med Health; 1997 Aug; 51(33):suppl 1-4. PubMed ID: 10168967
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Medicaid managed care: an update.
Ullmann E
Med Interface; 1995 Oct; 8(10):92-4. PubMed ID: 10152333
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
