BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10167773)

  • 1. How to buy 1-tesla MR scanner by the numbers.
    Cvitanic O; Kimzey M
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1997 Jun; 19(6):91-4. PubMed ID: 10167773
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prospects for increasing the accessibility of MRI.
    Kaufman L; Crooks L; Arakawa M; Hoenninger J; Watts J; Winkler M
    Adm Radiol; 1987 Nov; 6(11):32-4, 36-8. PubMed ID: 10285607
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Tolerance of magnetic resonance imaging in children and adolescents performed in a 1.5 Tesla MR scanner with an open design].
    Adamietz B; Cavallaro A; Radkow T; Alibek S; Holter W; Bautz WA; Staatz G
    Rofo; 2007 Aug; 179(8):826-31. PubMed ID: 17577870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using cost-volume-profit methods to purchase open MRI equipment.
    Landry C; Knox J; Brown B
    Radiol Manage; 1996; 18(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 10154331
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Feasibility of cardiac gating free of interference with electro-magnetic fields at 1.5 Tesla, 3.0 Tesla and 7.0 Tesla using an MR-stethoscope.
    Frauenrath T; Hezel F; Heinrichs U; Kozerke S; Utting JF; Kob M; Butenweg C; Boesiger P; Niendorf T
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):539-47. PubMed ID: 19652614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. MRI site planning adventures.
    Pooley RA; Felmlee JP
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Nov; 1(11):871-3. PubMed ID: 17411721
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. 3.0 Tesla MR systems.
    Moser E; Trattnig S
    Invest Radiol; 2003 Jul; 38(7):375-6. PubMed ID: 12821850
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. MRI vs. angio. A comparison of costs and efficiency.
    Oates M; Hartnell G
    Adm Radiol; 1994 Mar; 13(3):31-3. PubMed ID: 10133611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. 7-tesla small animal MR imaging.
    Hadlich S; Kühn JP; Puls D
    Radiol Technol; 2009; 80(6):585-8. PubMed ID: 19584369
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost analysis of equipment failure of a radiology department and possible choices about maintenance.
    Grisi G; Dalla Palma L; Rimondini A; Palmolungo C; Cuttin Zernich R; Pozzi Mucelli R
    Radiol Med; 2002; 103(1-2):91-107. PubMed ID: 11859305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mid-field scanners rival high-field establishment.
    Williams V
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1998 Oct; Suppl Open Mri():MR25-7. PubMed ID: 10186937
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Why buy a PET/MR for high end research?
    von Schulthess GK
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Aug; 40(2):283-4. PubMed ID: 24115270
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intraoperative MRI: a moving magnet.
    Sutherland GR; Louw DF
    CMAJ; 1999 Nov; 161(10):1293. PubMed ID: 10584095
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. High-pass two-dimensional ladder network resonators for magnetic resonance imaging.
    Voss HU; Ballon DJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Dec; 53(12 Pt 2):2590-3. PubMed ID: 17152437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How to buy high-tech imaging equipment: is there a prophet in the house?
    Levin DC; Templeton A; Casarella W
    Health Technol; 1989; 3(2):14-9. PubMed ID: 10304399
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The how and why of a marketing budget.
    Hughes C; Van Gilse M
    Adm Radiol; 1991 Nov; 10(11):51-5. PubMed ID: 10115720
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An MR transceive phased array designed for spinal cord imaging at 3 Tesla: preliminary investigations of spinal cord imaging at 3 T.
    Peterson DM; Duensing GR; Caserta J; Fitzsimmons JR
    Invest Radiol; 2003 Jul; 38(7):428-35. PubMed ID: 12821857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cost evaluation study of radiodiagnosis department in a teaching institution.
    Gupta R; Gupta R; Berry M
    J Acad Hosp Adm; 1991 Jan; 3(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 10115752
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of a combined MR imaging and interventional radiology suite for intraprocedural monitoring of uterine artery embolization.
    Vin AP; Rhee TK; Ryu RK; Larson AC; Nikolaidis P; Chrisman HB; Vogelzang RL; Omary RA
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2007 Nov; 18(11):1362-7. PubMed ID: 18003985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Point of care medicine will once again reshape radiology's landscape.
    Crues JV
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 2000 Mar; 22(3):27-31. PubMed ID: 10947280
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.