234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10168633)
1. The law that shields HMOs from the risk doctors face.
Coleman DL
Manag Care; 1997 May; 6(5):25-6, 35-8, 41. PubMed ID: 10168633
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Emerging legal issues.
Marren JP
Manag Care Q; 1998; 6(2):59-64. PubMed ID: 10181707
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Will your HMO pull you into a malpractice suit?
Rice B
Med Econ; 1999 Mar; 76(5):200-2, 207-9. PubMed ID: 10346055
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Litigating around ERISA to quality managed healthcare: an HMO can breach fiduciary duties.
Karns JE
Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 2001 Mar; (263):9-30. PubMed ID: 11291401
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The people vs HMOs.
Howe RF
Time; 1999 Feb; 153(4):46-7. PubMed ID: 10345773
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Vicarious liability: is ERISA preemption a successful defense?
Lederberg MB
Med Health R I; 1997 Feb; 80(2):69-70. PubMed ID: 9046780
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Groping for the reins: ERISA, HMO malpractice, and enterprise liability.
Kilcullen JK
Am J Law Med; 1996; 22(1):7-50. PubMed ID: 8819595
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. ERISA shield is cracked; HMOs open to liability. Improves legal atmosphere for physicians, patients. Employee Retirement Income Security Act.
Pa Med; 1999 Feb; 102(2):1-2. PubMed ID: 10070189
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. What recourse? Liability for managed-care decisions and the Employee Retirement Income Security Act.
Mariner WK
N Engl J Med; 2000 Aug; 343(8):592-6. PubMed ID: 10954770
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Coming in first.
Ortolon K
Tex Med; 1997 Sep; 93(9):26-30. PubMed ID: 9754393
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Health plan liability.
Coleman D
Healthplan; 1997; 38(2):77-81. PubMed ID: 10176856
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Marketplace. State lawmakers consider keeping HMOs in line through malpractice suits.
Moskowitz DB
Med Health; 1998 Feb; 52(6):suppl 1-2. PubMed ID: 10176439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. ERISA preemption defenses rejected. Nealy v. US Healthcare HMO.
Hosp Law Newsl; 2000 Jan; 17(3):4-6. PubMed ID: 10724626
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. ERISA. Employee Retirement Income Security Act.
Berlin L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Jan; 174(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 10628447
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. New threat to HMOs. Bill to amend ERISA would allow patients to sue.
Gardner J
Mod Healthc; 1998 Jan; 28(4):38. PubMed ID: 10175941
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. HMO liability battleground moving to courts, statehouse.
Briskin A; Hinkley G
Manag Care; 1999 Nov; 8(11):22, 25. PubMed ID: 10977316
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Time for reckoning ... Wall Street wasn't interested in healthcare because it had not yet become big business.
Hage SJ
Radiol Manage; 1998; 20(6):25-6. PubMed ID: 10338851
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. ERISA-HMOs are using the law against the people it was designed to protect.
D'Ambrosia R
Orthopedics; 1997 May; 20(5):393. PubMed ID: 9172244
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Credentialing liability in the managed care arena.
Michel CP
Tort Insur Law J; 1999; 35(1):137-53. PubMed ID: 11475509
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Preemption of a state "legislatively created" right to sue HMOs for negligence. Corporate Health Ins. Inc. v. Texas Dept. of Insurance.
Jordan KA
Health Care Law Mon; 1999 Apr; ():13-24. PubMed ID: 10351769
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
