These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10169128)

  • 21. Promises, promises.
    Conde C
    Tex Med; 2008 Apr; 104(4):18-24. PubMed ID: 18610863
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Reviewing the reviewers.
    Lazarus A
    Psychiatr Serv; 2001 Feb; 52(2):133. PubMed ID: 11157104
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The liability of medical directors for utilization review decisions.
    Trueman DL
    J Health Law; 2002; 35(1):105-43. PubMed ID: 11974520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The evolution of utilization review liability.
    Reagan ME
    Health Care Law Newsl; 1992 Dec; 7(12):3-7. PubMed ID: 10123071
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Court overturns jury's verdict on Blue Cross antitrust violation claim.
    Kazon PM
    Bus Health; 1988 Nov; 6(1):44-5. PubMed ID: 10290529
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Providers beware: HMOs may control your destiny.
    Riley JB; Pristave RJ
    Nephrol News Issues; 1995 Apr; 9(4):14-6. PubMed ID: 7630436
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Texas MDs hope FTC will corral an HMO.
    Leg Aspects Med Pract; 1980 Aug; 8(8):37. PubMed ID: 7401867
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Going toe-to-toe with Blue Shield--for $110,000.
    Rudolph JP
    Med Econ; 1999 Jan; 76(2):116, 118. PubMed ID: 10345657
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. How I beat an HMO.
    Rice B
    Med Econ; 2004 Jan; 81(1):88-90, 93, 97. PubMed ID: 14959609
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Pennsylvania court decision on physician's rights raises questions. Carlini v. Highmark.
    Hosp Law Newsl; 2001 Mar; 18(5):1-4. PubMed ID: 11225373
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Calif. jury clears Blues on UR call.
    Kenkel PJ
    Mod Healthc; 1992 Apr; 22(17):18. PubMed ID: 10117570
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Dr. Davids beat HMO Goliath.
    Rice B
    Med Econ; 2005 Feb; 82(3):52-4. PubMed ID: 15765721
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Blues plan more HMO involvement.
    Employee Benefit Plan Rev; 1978 Sep; 33(3):34. PubMed ID: 10277895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Alternative dispute resolution. The court of first resort.
    Close LF
    Minn Med; 2002 Jan; 85(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 12793232
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Recommendations for new medical directors and physician advisors. Administrative clinical pearls.
    Fetterolf DE
    Physician Exec; 1996 Dec; 22(12):33-5. PubMed ID: 10163280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Is this group an illegal doctor monopoly?
    Slomski AJ
    Med Econ; 1994 Sep; 71(18):64-6, 69-70, 72 passim. PubMed ID: 10136387
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Blues, state settle dispute; HMOs, employers unsettled.
    Burda D
    Mod Healthc; 1988 Apr; 18(16):43. PubMed ID: 10286935
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. From legislator: views on third-party reimbursement for nurses.
    Goldwater M
    Am J Nurs; 1982 Mar; 82(3):411-4. PubMed ID: 7039312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Common law tort liability of health maintenance organizations.
    Panah L
    J Health Hosp Law; 1996; 29(3):146-59, 192. PubMed ID: 10160032
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Arizonans square off on HMO guaranty funds.
    Traska MR
    Hospitals; 1988 Feb; 62(4):50. PubMed ID: 3338763
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.