172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10169397)
1. A cost-utility analysis of second-line chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer. Docetaxel versus paclitaxel versus vinorelbine.
Launois R; Reboul-Marty J; Henry B; Bonneterre J
Pharmacoeconomics; 1996 Nov; 10(5):504-21. PubMed ID: 10169397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [A medico-economic evaluation of second line chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer: comparison between docetaxel, paclitaxel, and vinorelbine].
Launois RJ; Reboul-Marty JM; Bonneterre J
Bull Cancer; 1997 Jul; 84(7):709-21. PubMed ID: 9339197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.
Clegg A; Scott DA; Sidhu M; Hewitson P; Waugh N
Health Technol Assess; 2001; 5(32):1-195. PubMed ID: 12065068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost effectiveness of treatment options in advanced breast cancer in the UK.
Brown RE; Hutton J; Burrell A
Pharmacoeconomics; 2001; 19(11):1091-102. PubMed ID: 11735676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost-utility analysis of chemotherapy using paclitaxel, docetaxel, or vinorelbine for patients with anthracycline-resistant breast cancer.
Leung PP; Tannock IF; Oza AM; Puodziunas A; Dranitsaris G
J Clin Oncol; 1999 Oct; 17(10):3082-90. PubMed ID: 10506603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Docetaxel. A pharmacoeconomic review of its use in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer.
Lamb HM; Wiseman LR
Pharmacoeconomics; 1998 Oct; 14(4):447-59. PubMed ID: 10344911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A rapid and systematic review of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the taxanes used in the treatment of advanced breast and ovarian cancer.
Lister-Sharp D; McDonagh MS; Khan KS; Kleijnen J
Health Technol Assess; 2000; 4(17):1-113. PubMed ID: 11074389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An economic evaluation of docetaxel and paclitaxel regimens in metastatic breast cancer in the UK.
Benedict A; Cameron DA; Corson H; Jones SE
Pharmacoeconomics; 2009; 27(10):847-59. PubMed ID: 19803539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Population-based pharmacoeconomic model for adopting capecitabine/docetaxel combination treatment for anthracycline-pretreated metastatic breast cancer.
Verma S; Ilersich AL
Oncologist; 2003; 8(3):232-40. PubMed ID: 12773745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-effectiveness analysis of docetaxel versus weekly paclitaxel in adjuvant treatment of regional breast cancer in New Zealand.
Webber-Foster R; Kvizhinadze G; Rivalland G; Blakely T
Pharmacoeconomics; 2014 Jul; 32(7):707-24. PubMed ID: 24859241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost-effectiveness analyses of docetaxel versus paclitaxel once weekly in patients with metastatic breast cancer in progression following anthracycline chemotherapy, in Spain.
Frías C; Cortés J; Seguí MÁ; Oyagüez I; Casado MÁ
Clin Transl Oncol; 2010 Oct; 12(10):692-700. PubMed ID: 20947484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-utility analysis of taxane therapy.
Yee GC
Am J Health Syst Pharm; 1997 Dec; 54(24 Suppl 2):S11-5. PubMed ID: 9435927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost-utility model comparing docetaxel and paclitaxel in advanced breast cancer patients.
Brown RE; Hutton J
Anticancer Drugs; 1998 Nov; 9(10):899-907. PubMed ID: 9890701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. nab-Paclitaxel weekly or every 3 weeks compared to standard docetaxel as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer: an economic analysis of a prospective randomized trial.
Dranitsaris G; Coleman R; Gradishar W
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2010 Feb; 119(3):717-24. PubMed ID: 19495958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Economic analysis of albumin-bound paclitaxel for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer.
Dranitsaris G; Cottrell W; Spirovski B; Hopkins S
J Oncol Pharm Pract; 2009 Jun; 15(2):67-78. PubMed ID: 19036903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluating new treatments for advanced cancer.
Botwood N
Br J Cancer; 2001 Jul; 85(1):139-40. PubMed ID: 11437417
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost utility in second-line metastatic breast cancer.
Berdeaux G; Hurteloup P
Pharmacoeconomics; 1997 May; 11(5):492-7. PubMed ID: 10168037
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A cost--utility analysis comparing second-line chemotherapy schemes in patients with metastatic breast cancer.
Li N; van Agthoven M; Willemse P; Uyl-de Groot C
Anticancer Drugs; 2001 Jul; 12(6):533-40. PubMed ID: 11460000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Survival outcome and cost-effectiveness with docetaxel and paclitaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a population-based evaluation.
Vu T; Ellard S; Speers CH; Taylor SC; de Lemos ML; Hu F; Kuik K; Olivotto IA
Ann Oncol; 2008 Mar; 19(3):461-4. PubMed ID: 18006892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost-effectiveness of combination versus sequential docetaxel and carboplatin for the treatment of platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian cancer.
Havrilesky LJ; Pokrzywinski R; Revicki D; Higgins RV; Nycum LR; Kohler MF; Berchuck A; Myers ER; Secord AA
Cancer; 2012 Jan; 118(2):386-91. PubMed ID: 21598242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
