These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10169440)
1. Annotated bibliography. Data quality. Chicco J Health Inf Manag; 1997; 27(1):12-21. PubMed ID: 10169440 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Research review: reimbursement optimization and the quality of multihospital discharge databases. Mensah EK; Dixon CR Top Health Inf Manage; 1996 Feb; 16(3):72-87. PubMed ID: 10156204 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. HIMAA response to the Issues Paper:"The Future of Casemix Development in Australia; July 1996". Health Information Management Association of Australia. Health Inf Manag; 1996; 26(2):68-71. PubMed ID: 10164801 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessing managed care market variation in reports of coding accuracy. Lorence DP; Spink A; Jameson R Manag Care Q; 2002; 10(4):15-25. PubMed ID: 12561390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Audit of the quality of hospital discharge data. Pears J; Alexander V; Alexander GF; Waugh NR Health Bull (Edinb); 1992 Sep; 50(5):356-61. PubMed ID: 1399582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improving the accuracy of the computerized medical record. Ramsay A; Peterson T; Earle D Top Health Rec Manage; 1989 Sep; 10(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 10303871 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Eurothemes. Informatics, who registers what for whom and why?]. Spanjer JM Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1990 Mar; 134(9):449-52. PubMed ID: 2314509 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of a nursing information system on the quality of information processing in nursing: An evaluation study using the HIS-monitor instrument. Ammenwerth E; Rauchegger F; Ehlers F; Hirsch B; Schaubmayr C Int J Med Inform; 2011 Jan; 80(1):25-38. PubMed ID: 21115392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Discharge-to-bill drop time is 24 to 48 hours. Healthc Benchmarks; 1998 Jun; 5(6):77-9. PubMed ID: 10180346 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Benchmarking variation in coding accuracy across the United States. Lorence DP; Ibrahim IA J Health Care Finance; 2003; 29(4):29-42. PubMed ID: 12908652 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Involve physicians and coders in measuring and improving clinical outcomes. Hosp Peer Rev; 2000 Feb; 25(2):17-21. PubMed ID: 11183854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of coding data quality of the HCUP National Inpatient Sample. Berthelsen CL Top Health Inf Manage; 2000 Nov; 21(2):10-23. PubMed ID: 11143275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-AM. Australian modifications; ICD-10 changes. Health Inf Manag; 1997; 27(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 10169441 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Multilevel reviews for coding accuracy. Stavely S Top Health Inf Manage; 2000 Nov; 21(2):30-3. PubMed ID: 11143277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Evaluation of the impact of a training program on the quality of hospital discharge record data]. Lorenzoni L; Da Cas R; Aparo UL Recenti Prog Med; 2000 Jan; 91(1):9-11. PubMed ID: 10705777 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Prospectives and trends in specialization in the Automatized System of Scientific Medical Information]. Bagdasarian SM; Zhukov GA; Vul IuI; Soshnikova RI; Khlebnova LN; Ilchenko AI Sov Med; 1973 Mar; 36(3):135-7. PubMed ID: 4585631 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Quality of hospital discharge data in Piedmont]. Siliquini R; Morgagni S; Morra A; Saglione GL; Nante N; Renga G Ann Ig; 2001; 13(4):365-74. PubMed ID: 11590872 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]