97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10170153)
1. CR, flat-panel radiography to compete and likely coexist.
Cannavo MJ
Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1997 Sep; Suppl():P16, P19-20. PubMed ID: 10170153
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. It's not the principle of the thing.
Rogers LJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Oct; 169(4):933. PubMed ID: 9334134
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Calculate film costs before going electronic.
King BF
Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1997 Sep; Suppl():P47-50. PubMed ID: 10170156
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Determining the total cost of ownership of CCD and laser scanners.
Cannavo MJ
Telemed Today; 1999 Apr; 7(2):34-6. PubMed ID: 10557533
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Taking digital imaging to the next level: challenges and opportunities.
Hobbs WC
Radiol Manage; 2004; 26(2):16-20. PubMed ID: 15098897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An evaluation of the financial impacts of optical disk storage for digital radiography.
Stockburger WT
Radiol Manage; 1987; 9(4):35-9. PubMed ID: 10284737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Refining image quality and calibration.
Davis A
Adm Radiol J; 1996 Oct; 15(10):21-4. PubMed ID: 10164840
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Update on digital radiography.
Schaefer-Prokop C; Uffmann M
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Nov; 72(2):193. PubMed ID: 19766420
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Medical and economic aspects of digital roentgenography].
Bagaeva NG
Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 2002; (4):52-3. PubMed ID: 12577666
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-effectiveness of digital radiography.
Reiser M; Pistitsch C; Nissen-Meyer S
Acad Radiol; 1998 Sep; 5 Suppl 2():S411-5. PubMed ID: 9750870
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Information technology--radiology's new "high ground".
Van Moore A
J Am Coll Radiol; 2008 Jan; 5(1):2-3. PubMed ID: 18179998
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Perspectives and problems of digital radiography at the beginning of the third millennium.
Marano P
Rays; 2003; 28(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 14509174
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Justifying PACS.
Drew PG
Health Manag Technol; 1997 Feb; 18(2):84, 86, 88. PubMed ID: 10165194
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Direct radiography can boost radiology productivity, cut costs.
Health Care Cost Reengineering Rep; 1998 Mar; 3(3):38-42. PubMed ID: 10178786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Digital imaging system are rapidly introduced in Swedish departments of radiography. This calls for new strategic planning].
Laurin S; Norberg KA
Lakartidningen; 2000 Oct; 97(41):4600-1. PubMed ID: 11107746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. PACS investment gains you a foothold on competition.
Cannavo MJ
Health Manag Technol; 1996 May; 17(6):20, 22. PubMed ID: 10157288
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Developments in medical imaging.
Layzell PA
Health Estate J; 1991 Oct; 45(8):7-8, 10, 12. PubMed ID: 10115154
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Digital x-ray systems. Part 2. An overview of digital radiography concepts and an evaluation of cassetteless DX systems.
Health Devices; 2001 Nov; 30(11):381-401. PubMed ID: 11770228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. PACS: radiology in the digital world.
Rogers LF
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Sep; 177(3):499. PubMed ID: 11517037
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Cassette based digital X-ray systems: evaluating the Konica Minolta Xpress CR.
Health Devices; 2005 Nov; 34(11):365-77. PubMed ID: 16454117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
