303 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10170769)
1. Chest image quality: film-screen vs. computed radiography.
Freedman M
Adm Radiol; 1991 Jul; 10(7):38-40, 42. PubMed ID: 10170769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Digital thoracic radiography--a comparison of digital and analog imaging techniques].
Busch HP
Bildgebung; 1991; 58 Suppl 1():9-12. PubMed ID: 1799858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [New imaging methods in thoracic diagnosis. A study to evaluate digital storage screen radiography, the slit technique ("AMBER"), asymmetric ("InSight") and conventional film-screen techniques].
Lehmann KJ; Busch HP; Drescher P; Loose R; Georgi M
Aktuelle Radiol; 1993 Jan; 3(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 8448224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Computed and conventional chest radiography: a comparison of image quality and radiation dose.
Ramli K; Abdullah BJ; Ng KH; Mahmud R; Hussain AF
Australas Radiol; 2005 Dec; 49(6):460-6. PubMed ID: 16351609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Physical image quality comparison of four types of digital detector for chest radiology.
Fernandez JM; Ordiales JM; Guibelalde E; Prieto C; Vano E
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):140-3. PubMed ID: 18283060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [The physical aspects of traditional radiology and of computed radiology compared].
Bacarini L; Giacomich R; Saccavini C
Radiol Med; 1995 Apr; 89(4):506-19. PubMed ID: 7597234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [New analog and digital imaging techniques for chest diagnosis--principles--clinical value--economics].
Busch HP; Lehmann KJ; Georgi M
Aktuelle Radiol; 1993 Jan; 3(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 8448232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Analysis of image quality in digital chest imaging.
De Hauwere A; Bacher K; Smeets P; Verstraete K; Thierens H
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):174-7. PubMed ID: 16461499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Productivity and cost assessment of computed radiography, digital radiography, and screen-film for outpatient chest examinations.
Andriole KP
J Digit Imaging; 2002 Sep; 15(3):161-9. PubMed ID: 12532253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Portable chest imaging: comparison of storage phosphor digital, asymmetric screen-film, and conventional screen-film systems.
Niklason LT; Chan HP; Cascade PN; Chang CL; Chee PW; Mathews JF
Radiology; 1993 Feb; 186(2):387-93. PubMed ID: 8421740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Digital chest radiology.
Hansell DM
Curr Opin Radiol; 1991 Jun; 3(3):364-71. PubMed ID: 1859770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [An economic comparison between digital luminescence radiography and conventional film processing in intensive care medicine].
Peters PE; Dykstra DE; Wiesmann W; Schlüchtermann J; Adam D
Radiologe; 1992 Nov; 32(11):536-40. PubMed ID: 1461981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Chest radiography: ROC phantom study of four different digital systems and one conventional radiographic system].
Redlich U; Reissberg S; Hoeschen C; Effenberger O; Fessel A; Preuss H; Scherlach C; Döhring W
Rofo; 2003 Jan; 175(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 12525979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The evolution of digital radiography: from storage phosphors to flat-panel detectors.
Porcelli A; Maggi F; Spalvieri S; Meduri A; Marano P
Rays; 2003; 28(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 14509175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Can digital luminescent radiography substitute for conventional x-ray technics in chest radiography?].
Neufang KF; Krug B; Lorenz R; Steinbrich W
Rofo; 1990 May; 152(5):501-9. PubMed ID: 2160680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Patient doses and image quality in digital chest radiology.
Salát D; Nikodemová D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):147-9. PubMed ID: 18321878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Digital chest radiography system with amorphous selenium flat-panel detectors: Qualitative and dosimetric comparison with a dedicated film-screen system.
Prato A; Ropolo R; Fava C
Radiol Med; 2005; 110(5-6):561-73. PubMed ID: 16437042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Direct comparison of conventional and computed radiography with a dual-image recording technique.
MacMahon H; Sanada S; Doi K; Giger M; Xu XW; Yin FF; Montner SM; Carlin M
Radiographics; 1991 Mar; 11(2):259-68. PubMed ID: 2028063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Diagnostic value of digital projection radiography in comparison with conventional roentgen technique].
Krug B; Zähringer M; Lackner K
Aktuelle Radiol; 1997 Mar; 7(2):65-8. PubMed ID: 9172665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [The amorphous selenium based flat-panel detector. Clinical experiences].
Schmidt EL; Herbig W
Radiologe; 2003 May; 43(5):374-8. PubMed ID: 12764586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
