278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10171014)
1. Responding to the codependent employee.
Davidhizar R
Health Care Superv; 1992 Jun; 10(4):36-44. PubMed ID: 10171014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Establishing a criterion-based performance appraisal for a department of nursing.
Megel MA
Nurs Clin North Am; 1983 Sep; 18(3):449-56. PubMed ID: 6554709
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Six Sigma: not for the faint of heart.
Benedetto AR
Radiol Manage; 2003; 25(2):40-53. PubMed ID: 12800564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Psychological preparedness.
Christensen PB; Cogdell CH
Nurse Managers Bookshelf; 1989 Jun; 1(2):7-18. PubMed ID: 2640604
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [The systematic approach: for more efficient management, a new lecture tool in organizations].
Crepin D
Rech Soins Infirm; 2007 Dec; (91):97-105. PubMed ID: 18284096
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Staff nurse performance. Effects of goal-setting and performance feedback.
Stull MK
J Nurs Adm; 1986; 16(7-8):26-30. PubMed ID: 3637221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Measurement technology applications in performance appraisal.
Stalker MZ; Kornblith AB; Lewis PM; Parker R
J Nurs Adm; 1986 Apr; 16(4):12-7. PubMed ID: 3633963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Being objective about appraisal.
McKenzie I
Nurs Times; 1985 Dec 18-31; 81(51):25-6. PubMed ID: 3853781
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Codependency in nurses. How it affects your organization.
Wise B; Ferreiro B
J Nurs Adm; 1995 Sep; 25(9):35-41. PubMed ID: 7674043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Nurse managers as transformational and transactional leaders.
McGuire E; Kennerly SM
Nurs Econ; 2006; 24(4):179-85, 175. PubMed ID: 16967888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Communication: key contributor to effectiveness--a nurse executive responds.
Wolf GA
J Nurs Adm; 1986 Sep; 16(9):26-8. PubMed ID: 3638337
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Human capital management: Implications for health care leaders.
Hart KA
Nurs Econ; 2006; 24(4):218-9, 222. PubMed ID: 16967894
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Managing nurses with health concerns.
Letvak S
Nurs Manage; 2012 Mar; 43(3):7-10. PubMed ID: 22377598
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Chemical dependency. Helping your staff.
Kabb GM
J Nurs Adm; 1984 Nov; 14(11):18-23. PubMed ID: 6567658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A framework for assessing performance problems.
Meyer AL
J Nurs Adm; 1984 May; 14(5):40-3. PubMed ID: 6562171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Progressive discipline in nursing. Arbitrators' decisions.
Kjervik DK
J Nurs Adm; 1984 Apr; 14(4):34-7. PubMed ID: 6561247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Guidelines for introducing change.
New JR; Couillard NA
J Nurs Adm; 1981 Mar; 11(3):17-21. PubMed ID: 6924945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Performance appraisal systems in health care administration.
Wiatrowski MD; Palkon DS
Health Care Manage Rev; 1987; 12(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 3557974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A competency-based approach to public health nursing performance appraisal.
Kalb KB; Cherry NM; Kauzloric J; Brender A; Green K; Miyagawa L; Shinoda-Mettler A
Public Health Nurs; 2006; 23(2):115-38. PubMed ID: 16684187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Queen busting. II. Ending the reign.
Keeling EB
Nurs Manage; 1997 Jan; 28(1):37-8. PubMed ID: 9004684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
