214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10171233)
1. Using cost-effectiveness analysis to weigh testing decisions.
Popper C
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1992 Sep; 24(9S Suppl):29-35. PubMed ID: 10171233
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Selecting instruments with an eye to CLIA.
Lifshitz MS; De Cresce RP
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1992 Aug; 24(8):33-6. PubMed ID: 10171088
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost analysis for instrument selection.
Artiss JD; Butros F
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1995 Feb; 27(2):32-8. PubMed ID: 10140538
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost analysis of immunochemistry instrumentation.
Artiss JD; Butros F
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1996 Nov; 28(11):36, 38, 40-2. PubMed ID: 10162662
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. New POCT (point-of-care testing) guide establishes testing uniformity.
Goldsmith BM
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1995 Aug; 27(8):50-2. PubMed ID: 10172406
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Testing at the patient's bedside.
Jones BA
Clin Lab Med; 1994 Sep; 14(3):473-91. PubMed ID: 7805342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Should your lab perform tumor immunology?
Wass JA; Patton K
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1990 Jan; 22(1):41-3. PubMed ID: 10170492
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Planning future hospital laboratory services: using benchmarks to evaluate laboratory operational and organizational strategies.
Portugal B
Hosp Technol Ser; 1996 Nov; 15(15):1-24. PubMed ID: 10172864
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Gains in productivity, technology keeping lid on cost of lab tests.
Wagner M
Mod Healthc; 1992 Aug; 22(31):16. PubMed ID: 10171053
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A new way to determine test cost per instrument. Part II.
Travers EM; Krochmal CF
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1988 Nov; 20(11):59-62. PubMed ID: 10318135
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Laboratory non-salary expenses per billable test.
Passiment E
Hosp Mater Manage; 1992 Oct; 17(10):10-1. PubMed ID: 10171299
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Total quality management: an application in a biomedical laboratory.
Latzer DB
Hosp Cost Manag Account; 1997 May; 9(2):1-6. PubMed ID: 10172989
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A new way to determine test cost per instrument. Part I.
Travers EM; Krochmal CF
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1988 Oct; 20(10):24-9. PubMed ID: 10318119
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Quality control practices and preferences in today's clinical laboratory. A report for government regulators, decision makers, and advisors.
Cooper WG
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1997 Jun; 29(6):56-7, 60, 62-5. PubMed ID: 10173036
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Buying lab equipment: comparative analysis reveals operating costs.
Bunata EV
Mater Manag Health Care; 1992 Sep; 1(7):28-9. PubMed ID: 10171421
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Total cost reduction in the laboratory: a team effort.
Forsman RW
J Healthc Mater Manage; 1994 Mar; 12(3):14-5, 20, 22. PubMed ID: 10171866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Laboratory financial management: a tool for analyzing productivity, cost-effectiveness, and utilization.
Lepoff R; Champion P
Hosp Technol Ser; 1995 Jul; 14(7):7-8. PubMed ID: 10144660
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A priori considerations when using laboratory determinations in cost-effectiveness and clinical decision analyses.
Barr JT
Am J Med Technol; 1981 Aug; 47(8):619-29. PubMed ID: 6792918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. CLIA national survey, Part 1. CLIA after year 1: no help to patients, and a hindrance to labs.
Jahn M
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1994 May; 26(5):20-6. PubMed ID: 10171847
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The hybrid laboratory: shifting the focus to the point of care.
Kost GJ
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1992 Sep; 24(9S Suppl):17-21, 24-8. PubMed ID: 10171231
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
