186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10171385)
21. A primer on the legal pitfalls of physician ownership and self-referral practices.
Steiner JE; Wagner MJ
J Health Hosp Law; 1992 Sep; 25(9):257-64. PubMed ID: 10123300
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Physician refer thyself: is Stark II, phase III the final voyage?
Manchikanti L; McMahon EB
Pain Physician; 2007 Nov; 10(6):725-41. PubMed ID: 17987094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. HHS publishes long-awaited fraud and abuse anti-kickback regulations.
Weissburg C; Conn LC
Rev Fed Am Health Syst; 1989; 22(2):45-7. PubMed ID: 10303427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Nuclear options: why there will be a fire sale on nuclear imaging equipment in 2006.
Wright W
Tenn Med; 2006 Sep; 99(9):31-2. PubMed ID: 17225778
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. The Stark reality. Reflections on impending legislation.
Hughes CM
Adm Radiol; 1989 Mar; 8(3):30-2. PubMed ID: 10303468
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Despite some overlap, ethical and legal issues of physician self-referral remain distinct.
Randall T
JAMA; 1991 Nov; 266(17):2335. PubMed ID: 1920735
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Self-referral issue targeted on two fronts.
Burda I
Mod Healthc; 1992 Jun; 22(26):3. PubMed ID: 10118667
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Physician self-referral: empirical evidence and policy implications.
Mitchell JM; Scott E
Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res; 1992; 13():27-42. PubMed ID: 10171713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Regulating physician investment and referral behavior in the competitive health care marketplace of the '90s--an argument for decentralization.
King KA
Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1991 Apr; (146):7-25. PubMed ID: 10110007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Fraud, abuse issues in cooperative health care ventures: an analysis.
Blacker RA; Tully WB
Rev Fed Am Health Syst; 1987; 20(1):44-5. PubMed ID: 10301420
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. The anti-referral movement in health care.
Winston WJ
Health Mark Q; 1993; 11(1-2):5-8. PubMed ID: 10132855
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Stark's crusade: the Ethics in Patient Referrals Act of 1989.
Morse RA; Popovits RM
J Health Hosp Law; 1989 Jul; 22(7):208-16, 224. PubMed ID: 10304214
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. California to bar self-referrals.
Burda D
Mod Healthc; 1993 Oct; 23(40):6. PubMed ID: 10128503
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Special report. Rep. Pete Stark: point man on Part B policy. Interview by Roxanne Bolinger.
Stark P
Part B News; 1989 Apr; 3(4):suppl 1-6. PubMed ID: 10313587
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Revised Stark bill still packs enough wallop to slow ventures.
Tokarski C
Mod Healthc; 1989 Jul; 19(29):34, 36. PubMed ID: 10303663
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Physician-owned health care ventures: the question of patient referrals.
Valiant C
Physician Exec; 1986; 12(6):20-3. PubMed ID: 10311805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Phase I Stark II regulations provide some flexibility.
Chase L
Healthc Financ Manage; 2001 Oct; 55(10):52-9. PubMed ID: 11588868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. New legislation affecting physician ownership of, and referrals to, health care entities.
Klotz RB
Med Law; 1990; 9(3):950-6. PubMed ID: 2122163
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Proceed with caution: is making a disclosure under the self-referral disclosure protocol worth the risk?
McGovern M
Health Care Law Mon; 2012 Jan; 2012(1):2-5. PubMed ID: 22292200
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Lab operators and physicians await new policies under "NegReg".
Szabo J
MLO Med Lab Obs; 2001 May; 33(5):68. PubMed ID: 11373815
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
