99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10171532)
1. Pap smear furor may derail Clinton changes.
Scott L
Mod Healthc; 1993 Oct; 23(40):17. PubMed ID: 10171532
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Who needs another test?
BeSaw L
Tex Med; 1996 Sep; 92(9):26-9. PubMed ID: 8826771
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Harvard HMO improves Pap smear screening.
Herman R
QA Rev; 1989 Oct; 1(3):2-3. PubMed ID: 10318359
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. HMOs should stress quality tests in light of pap smear controversy.
Johnson DE
Contract Healthc; 1988 Feb; ():27. PubMed ID: 10318142
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Are you ready for a CLIA inspection?
Spencer C; Gorove C
Internist; 1993 Sep; 34(8):32-3. PubMed ID: 10171698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Companies build Pap smear safety nets.
Scott L
Mod Healthc; 1995 May; 25(19):70. PubMed ID: 10142267
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Pap smear concerns.
Moran T
Tex Med; 1997 Nov; 93(11):44-6. PubMed ID: 9369088
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Building outpatient volume through Pap smear testing.
Hatfield JD
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1989 Mar; 21(3):77-9. PubMed ID: 10318268
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A new era for the Pap test.
Holladay EB; Allen KA
JAAPA; 2001 Dec; 14(12):53-6. PubMed ID: 11824091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Liability issues with the Papanicolaou smear: the view of a hospital administrator at Newport Hospital, Newport, Rhode Island.
Sampson AJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Mar; 121(3):241-5. PubMed ID: 9111108
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Quality concerns uncovered at laboratories doing waived tests.
Szabo J
MLO Med Lab Obs; 2001 Oct; 33(10):32-4. PubMed ID: 11688089
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Waived testing.
Hansen K; Lavanty D
Clin Lab Sci; 2002; 15(1):4-5. PubMed ID: 12778947
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Genetic testing: should clinical laboratory regs cover DNA analyses?
Margolis RE
Healthspan; 1992 Oct; 9(9):18-9. PubMed ID: 10171296
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Are class 1 and class 2 Pap smears objectively interpreted?
Berube LW
Md State Med J; 1973 Sep; 22(9):54-8. PubMed ID: 4774187
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The four R's: reactive/repair, reporting, and regulations.
Moriarty AT; Young NA
Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Jul; 29(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 12827705
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A look at Pap test accuracy and the duty to inform from a risk management perspective.
Meister S
QRC Advis; 1997 Dec; 14(2):1, 5-8. PubMed ID: 10176015
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Medicare, Medicaid and CLIA programs; regulations implementing the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988--HCFA. Final rule; correction.
Fed Regist; 1993 Sep; 58(177):48323. PubMed ID: 10171695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. CLIA's effect on POLs (physicians' office laboratories).
Strauss S; Cembrowski GS; Adlis SA
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1995 Jun; 27(6):34-8. PubMed ID: 10172324
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A foundation for PT (proficiency test) success.
O'Brien JA
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1999 Feb; 31(2):44-8. PubMed ID: 10346358
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Saving laboratory records: what, how, how long?
Baer D
MLO Med Lab Obs; 2004 May; 36(5):10-1, 14-6; quiz 18-20. PubMed ID: 15179913
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
