These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10171791)
1. Establishing and evaluating QC acceptability criteria. Westgard JO; Quam EF; Barry PL MLO Med Lab Obs; 1994 Feb; 26(2):22-6. PubMed ID: 10171791 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Predicting the risk of failure in proficiency testing. Rhoads DG MLO Med Lab Obs; 1994 Mar; 26(3):52-6. PubMed ID: 10172148 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A program for assessing statistical QC procedures. Westgard JO MLO Med Lab Obs; 1994 Feb; 26(2):55, 58-60. PubMed ID: 10171792 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Corrective actions: what to do when control results are out of control. Seehafer JJ MLO Med Lab Obs; 1997 Mar; 29(3):34-6, 40. PubMed ID: 10172943 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Saving laboratory records: what, how, how long? Baer D MLO Med Lab Obs; 2004 May; 36(5):10-1, 14-6; quiz 18-20. PubMed ID: 15179913 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Pump up your PT IQ. Cembrowski GS; Anderson PG; Crampton CA; Coupland R; Carey RN MLO Med Lab Obs; 1996 Jan; 28(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 10172547 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. How total error can save time and money for the lab. Brooks Z; Massarella G; Plaut D MLO Med Lab Obs; 1994 Nov; 26(11):48, 50, 52-4. PubMed ID: 10172159 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Mathematical approaches to the analysis of laboratory data. Beck JR; Meier FA; Rawnsley HM Prog Clin Pathol; 1981; 8():67-100. PubMed ID: 7029628 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Spreadsheet templates for calculating precision according to NCCLS (National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards) guidelines. Smith MC; Sephel GC; Woodward SC MLO Med Lab Obs; 1993 Oct; 25(10):67-9. PubMed ID: 10171728 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Validity of laboratory diagnostic tests. 1. Principles for the determination of diagnostic efficiency of laboratory diagnostic test methods]. Irrgang B; Adam N; Becker D; Dummler W; Hölzel W; Neymeyer HG; Richter G; Schäfer C Z Med Lab Diagn; 1986; 27(5):278-85. PubMed ID: 3776302 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The quality of laboratory testing today: an assessment of sigma metrics for analytic quality using performance data from proficiency testing surveys and the CLIA criteria for acceptable performance. Westgard JO; Westgard SA Am J Clin Pathol; 2006 Mar; 125(3):343-54. PubMed ID: 16613337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Introduction of quality control of the analyses to the clinical diagnostic laboratories of Podol'sk]. Khramtsova TK; Kozlov PD; Mironova LI Lab Delo; 1979; (10):626-7. PubMed ID: 94136 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [An internal quality control system for the detection of clinically significant analytical errors]. Ruokonen A Duodecim; 1986; 102(9):579-85. PubMed ID: 3720595 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Use of statistical parameters for determining the distribution of random errors in laboratory practice]. Makarovskiĭ VV; Titova IA; Mikhaĭlov SV; Shafranskiĭ IuA; Ermakova EA Lab Delo; 1985; (1):54-6. PubMed ID: 2579279 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Quality control in the laboratory]. Wisser H; Knoll E Med Klin; 1974 Aug; 69(31):1287-96. PubMed ID: 4610333 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Quality control practices and preferences in today's clinical laboratory. A report for government regulators, decision makers, and advisors. Cooper WG MLO Med Lab Obs; 1997 Jun; 29(6):56-7, 60, 62-5. PubMed ID: 10173036 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]