BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10172016)

  • 1. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy vs traditional total abdominal and vaginal hysterectomies.
    Bronitsky C; Payne RJ; Stuckey S; Wilkins D
    J Gynecol Surg; 1993; 9(4):219-25. PubMed ID: 10172016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy in a university hospital. Decreasing the need for abdominal hysterectomy and increasing resident experience in vaginal surgery.
    Fylstra DL; Carter JF
    J Reprod Med; 1996 Jul; 41(7):497-503. PubMed ID: 8829062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Changing hysterectomy patterns after introduction of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy.
    Harris MB; Olive DL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Aug; 171(2):340-3; discussion 343-4. PubMed ID: 8059810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The medical and economic impact of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy in a large, metropolitan, not-for-profit hospital.
    Johns DA; Carrera B; Jones J; DeLeon F; Vincent R; Safely C
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jun; 172(6):1709-15; discussion 1715-9. PubMed ID: 7778623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy in a university hospital: report of 82 cases and comparison with abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy.
    Boike GM; Elfstrand EP; DelPriore G; Schumock D; Holley HS; Lurain JR
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jun; 168(6 Pt 1):1690-7; discussion 1697-701. PubMed ID: 8317510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy at a health maintenance organization. Cost-effectiveness and comparison with total abdominal hysterectomy.
    Bornstein SJ; Shaber RE
    J Reprod Med; 1995 Jun; 40(6):435-8. PubMed ID: 7650655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy with traditional hysterectomy for cost-effectiveness to employers.
    Lenihan JP; Kovanda C; Cammarano C
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jun; 190(6):1714-20; discussion 1720-2. PubMed ID: 15284779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Laparoscopic hysterectomy. Supracervical vs. assisted vaginal.
    Schwartz RO
    J Reprod Med; 1994 Aug; 39(8):625-30. PubMed ID: 7996527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prospective randomized clinical trial of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy.
    Falcone T; Paraiso MF; Mascha E
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Apr; 180(4):955-62. PubMed ID: 10203664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A multicenter randomized comparison of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy in abdominal hysterectomy candidates.
    Summitt RL; Stovall TG; Steege JF; Lipscomb GH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Sep; 92(3):321-6. PubMed ID: 9721763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparative study among laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy, vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy: experience in a tertiary care hospital in Bangladesh.
    Jahan S; Das TR; Mahmud N; Mondol SK; Habib SH; Saha S; Yasmin S; Joarder M
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2011; 31(3):254-7. PubMed ID: 21417652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of alternative techniques of hysterectomy in Ohio, 1988-1994.
    Weber AM; Lee JC
    N Engl J Med; 1996 Aug; 335(7):483-9. PubMed ID: 8672154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Laparoscopy vs. laparotomy for gynecologic procedures. Impact on resident training.
    Sultana CJ; Sogor L
    J Reprod Med; 1996 Apr; 41(4):225-30. PubMed ID: 8728072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [A comparative analysis of hysterectomies].
    Aniuliene R; Varzgaliene L; Varzgalis M
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2007; 43(2):118-24. PubMed ID: 17329946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy: report of 190 cases.
    Riza ED
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 1997 Feb; 7(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 9453860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing the role of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy in the everyday practice of gynecology.
    Han GS
    J Reprod Med; 1996 Jul; 41(7):521-8. PubMed ID: 8829066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy. The initial Nashville, Tennessee, experience.
    Daniell JF; Kurtz BR; McTavish G; Gurley LD; Shearer RA; Chambers JF; Staggs SM
    J Reprod Med; 1993 Jul; 38(7):537-42. PubMed ID: 8410849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Morbidity with total laparoscopic and laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy.
    Al-talib A; Sheizaf B; Almog B; Dawood A; Krishnamurthy S; Tulandi T
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2011 Mar; 90(3):284-7. PubMed ID: 21306312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparative study between laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy.
    Jaturasrivilai P
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2007 May; 90(5):837-43. PubMed ID: 17596034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical and financial analyses of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy.
    Hidlebaugh D; O'Mara P; Conboy E
    J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc; 1994 Aug; 1(4 Pt 1):357-61. PubMed ID: 9138877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.