These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10172105)
41. Impact of a simple intervention to increase primary care provider recognition of patient referral concerns. Albertson G; Lin CT; Schilling L; Cyran E; Anderson S; Anderson RJ Am J Manag Care; 2002 Apr; 8(4):375-81. PubMed ID: 11954555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Satisfaction with care in peritoneal dialysis patients. Kirchgessner J; Perera-Chang M; Klinkner G; Soley I; Marcelli D; Arkossy O; Stopper A; Kimmel PL Kidney Int; 2006 Oct; 70(7):1325-31. PubMed ID: 16900092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Interruptions during general practice consultations--the patients' view. Dearden A; Smithers M; Thapar A Fam Pract; 1996 Apr; 13(2):166-9. PubMed ID: 8732329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. [Validity and reliability of a new questionnaire on patient satisfaction in rehabilitative therapy]. Franchignoni F; Benevolo E; Ottonello M; Tesio L; Battaglia MA Minerva Med; 1998 Mar; 89(3):57-64. PubMed ID: 9575331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Patient satisfaction with out-of-hours primary care in the Netherlands. van Uden CJ; Ament AJ; Hobma SO; Zwietering PJ; Crebolder HF BMC Health Serv Res; 2005 Jan; 5(1):6. PubMed ID: 15651997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Questionnaire to assess patient satisfaction with pharmaceutical care in Spanish language. Traverso ML; Salamano M; Botta C; Colautti M; Palchik V; Pérez B Int J Qual Health Care; 2007 Aug; 19(4):217-24. PubMed ID: 17545673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Validity of instruments for measuring the satisfaction of a woman and her partner with care received during labour and childbirth: Systematic review. Alfaro Blazquez R; Corchon S; Ferrer Ferrandiz E Midwifery; 2017 Dec; 55():103-112. PubMed ID: 28992553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Quality of primary care practice in a large HMO according to physician specialty. Grumbach K; Selby JV; Schmittdiel JA; Quesenberry CP Health Serv Res; 1999 Jun; 34(2):485-502. PubMed ID: 10357286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Measuring quality of recovery-15 after day case surgery. Chazapis M; Walker EM; Rooms MA; Kamming D; Moonesinghe SR Br J Anaesth; 2016 Feb; 116(2):241-8. PubMed ID: 26787793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. QUOTE-HIV: an instrument for assessing quality of HIV care from the patients' perspective. Hekkink CF; Sixma HJ; Wigersma L; Yzermans CJ; Van Der Meer JT; Bindels PJ; Brinkman K; Danner SA Qual Saf Health Care; 2003 Jun; 12(3):188-93. PubMed ID: 12792008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. The FAMCARE-Patient scale: measuring satisfaction with care of outpatients with advanced cancer. Lo C; Burman D; Hales S; Swami N; Rodin G; Zimmermann C Eur J Cancer; 2009 Dec; 45(18):3182-8. PubMed ID: 19786345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Reliability and validity of a Thai version of the General Practice Assessment Questionnaire (GPAQ). Jaturapatporn D; Hathirat S; Manataweewat B; Dellow AC; Leelaharattanarak S; Sirimothya S; Dellow J; Udomsubpayakul U J Med Assoc Thai; 2006 Sep; 89(9):1491-6. PubMed ID: 17100390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Postal survey of patients' satisfaction with a general practice out of hours cooperative. Salisbury C BMJ; 1997 May; 314(7094):1594-8. PubMed ID: 9186172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Examining patient perceptions of quality care in general practice: comparison of quantitative and qualitative methods. Lewis JR; Williamson V Br J Gen Pract; 1995 May; 45(394):249-53. PubMed ID: 7619571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Aspects of patient satisfaction with communication in surgical care: confirming qualitative feedback through quantitative methods. Meredith P; Wood C Int J Qual Health Care; 1996 Jun; 8(3):253-64. PubMed ID: 8885189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. [A validated questionnaire for measuring patient satisfaction in general and specialist ambulatory medical care: the Qualiskope-A]. Gericke CA; Schiffhorst G; Busse R; Häussler B Gesundheitswesen; 2004 Nov; 66(11):723-31. PubMed ID: 15562342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Developing and validating a tool for assessment of pharmacist prescribers' consultations. Stewart D; George J; Bond C; Diack L; Cleland J; McCaig D; Cunningham S; MacLure K; Harkness S Fam Pract; 2010 Oct; 27(5):520-6. PubMed ID: 20530134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Comparison of three visit-specific patient satisfaction instruments: reliability and validity measures and the effect of four methods of data collection on dimensions of patient satisfaction. Trandel-Korenchuk DM J Ambul Care Manage; 1997 Oct; 20(4):56-73. PubMed ID: 10181624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Dimensions of coping in chronic pain patients: factor analysis and cross-validation of the German version of the Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ-D). Stoffel M; Reis D; Schwarz D; Schröder A Rehabil Psychol; 2013 Nov; 58(4):386-395. PubMed ID: 24128268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Measurement Under the Microscope: High Variability and Limited Construct Validity in Emergency Department Patient-Experience Scores. Pines JM; Penninti P; Alfaraj S; Carlson JN; Colfer O; Corbit CK; Venkat A Ann Emerg Med; 2018 May; 71(5):545-554.e6. PubMed ID: 29269006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]