228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10172234)
1. Technology, medicine & health, Part 4. Technological cancer: its causes & treatment.
Davidson SN
Healthc Forum J; 1995; 38(2):52-8. PubMed ID: 10172234
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. High tech, low yield: doctors' use of medical innovation.
Burke G
J Am Health Policy; 1994; 4(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 10131581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Process enhancement by using MultiLeaf Collimator (MLC) technology.
Chessman M
J Oncol Manag; 1998; 7(5):26-32. PubMed ID: 10187175
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A new golden age.
Levy R
Adm Radiol J; 1996 Jun; 15(6):40-2. PubMed ID: 10159373
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Biological, physical factors in clinical assessment of outcome of cancer therapy.
Perez CA
Rays; 2005; 30(2):85-98. PubMed ID: 16294900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. New medical technology diffusion key element in health cost increases.
Brown E
Physician Exec; 1996 Jan; 22(1):56-7. PubMed ID: 10155967
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Paying for miracles.
Kosterlitz J
Natl J (Wash); 1993 Aug; 25(32):1967-71. PubMed ID: 10127887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Estimating the effect of new technology on Medicare Part B expenditure and volume growth: do related procedures matter?
Lee DW
Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res; 1992; 13():43-64. PubMed ID: 10171714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The prospects for medical technology in the next decade.
Moseley GB
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2005; 118():15-31. PubMed ID: 16301766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Striking a balance on new technology. Cost-effectiveness analysis can help sort out emerging health care technologies, but what are the consequences for continued medical innovation?
Philipson TJ; Jena AB
AHIP Cover; 2006; 47(5):29, 31, 33. PubMed ID: 17007325
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Can surgical innovation survive? Panel presentations.
McKneally MF; Gleeson S; Balch CM; Mussallem MA; Abel DB; Bernhard VM
Bull Am Coll Surg; 1996 Apr; 81(4):8-21, 43. PubMed ID: 10156765
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The irresistible march of technology.
Hillman BJ
J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 Dec; 6(12):823. PubMed ID: 19945033
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The costs of medical technology.
Chernew M
Mich Health Hosp; 1997; 33(2):40-2. PubMed ID: 10165611
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Health technology assessment.
Kearney B
J Qual Clin Pract; 1996 Sep; 16(3):131-43. PubMed ID: 8887856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ensuring technological competence and leadership in medicine.
McGivney WT
Physician Exec; 1993; 19(1):50-1. PubMed ID: 10125939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Quality and innovation management in surgery for the patient's benefit].
Selbmann HK
Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd; 1997; 114():872-9. PubMed ID: 9574290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A clinical approach to technology assessment: how do we and how should we choose the right treatment?
Zietman A; Ibbott G
Semin Radiat Oncol; 2012 Jan; 22(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 22177874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Franchising allows continued diffusion of cardiac cath technology.
Freiherr G
Adm Radiol; 1994 Feb; 13(2):22, 24-5. PubMed ID: 10132927
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Technology tracking, transition, and transfer.
Ronning PL
Hosp Technol Ser; 1994 Jul; 13(9):5-7. PubMed ID: 10134923
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Technology temptations and tactics.
Ronning PL
Hosp Technol Ser; 1994 Mar; 13(3):8-11. PubMed ID: 10135180
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
