189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10172368)
1. Study deems single-use instruments more cost-effective than reusable in lap choly procedures.
Hosp Mater Manage; 1995 Jul; 20(7):18-9. PubMed ID: 10172368
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A prospective comparison of the costs of reusable and limited-reuse laparoscopic instruments.
DesCôteaux JG; Blackmore K; Parsons L
Can J Surg; 1998 Apr; 41(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 9575997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy lends itself well to another look at reusable vs. disposable instrument packs.
Hickey M; Fields M
Hosp Mater Manage; 1996 May; 21(5):14-5. PubMed ID: 10157583
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost-minimization analysis of jumbo reusable forceps versus disposable forceps in a high-volume ambulatory endoscopy center.
Hogan RB; Santa-Cruz R; Weeks ES; Alexander L; Hogan RB
Gastrointest Endosc; 2009 Feb; 69(2):284-8. PubMed ID: 18725156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Preliminary survey findings. Reusable vs. disposable laparoscopic instruments.
Cahill N
Bull Am Coll Surg; 1993 May; 78(5):28-9. PubMed ID: 10125975
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Choice to reuse disposables requires factual assessment.
Reichert M
OR Manager; 1996 Jun; 12(6):8-9. PubMed ID: 10157858
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A close-up look at laparoscopic instrument costs.
Mater Manag Health Care; 1993 Nov; 2(11):28-32. PubMed ID: 10171719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reuse of disposables. Reprocessing issues taking users down 'slippery slope'.
OR Manager; 1996 Jun; 12(6):1, 7. PubMed ID: 10157849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Reusable biopsy forceps: a cost-effective measure for the endoscopy suite.
Raltz SL; Kozarek RA; Pethigal PA; Moorhouse MA; Merriam LD
Gastroenterol Nurs; 1995; 18(5):167-70. PubMed ID: 7578296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reuse of disposable laparoscopic instruments: cost analysis.
DesCôteaux JG; Tye L; Poulin EC
Can J Surg; 1996 Apr; 39(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 8769924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Laparoscopic instruments. Patient care, cost issues.
Reichert M
AORN J; 1993 Mar; 57(3):637-51, 654-5. PubMed ID: 8439132
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Trocars: safety and selection. Emergency Care Research Institute.
Health Devices; 1998 Nov; 27(11):376-99. PubMed ID: 9859030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Disposable versus reusable biopsy forceps. A prospective cost analysis in the gastrointestinal endoscopy unit of the Dijon University Hospital].
Lejeune C; Prost P; Michiels C; Roullaud-Guenfoudi MP; Phelip JM; Martin L; Rassiat E; Faivre J
Gastroenterol Clin Biol; 2001; 25(6-7):669-73. PubMed ID: 11673734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Laparoscopic instruments good outsourcing candidates.
Whittington S; Vasey N
Hosp Mater Manage; 1997 Jun; 22(6):14-5. PubMed ID: 10173016
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Reusable vs. disposable laparoscopic instruments.
Voyles CR
Bull Am Coll Surg; 1993 Sep; 78(9):38-9. PubMed ID: 10128066
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Trocar talk.
Souhrada L
Mater Manag Health Care; 1996 Nov; 5(11):48-50. PubMed ID: 10172810
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The valve design of disposable and reusable trocars.
O'Rourke NA
Endosc Surg Allied Technol; 1995 Feb; 3(1):48-50. PubMed ID: 7757439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reusable versus single-use laparoscopy instruments: who is responsible for patient safety?
Cahill NE
Minim Invasive Surg Nurs; 1994; 8(2):68-70. PubMed ID: 7812384
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Do costs decide? Disposable or reusable instruments in laparoscopic cholecystectomy?].
Lefering R; Troidl H; Ure BM
Chirurg; 1994 Apr; 65(4):317-25. PubMed ID: 8020351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Economic impact of laparoscopic instrumentation: a company perspective.
Swem T; Fazzalari R
Endosc Surg Allied Technol; 1995; 3(2-3):129-32. PubMed ID: 7552128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
