167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10172756)
1. Increase in health care costs due to technological diffusion in diagnostic tests and diagnostic imaging.
Ikegami N; Ikeda S
Jpn Hosp; 1996 Jul; 15():15-23. PubMed ID: 10172756
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. If you have it, you use it. Latest Blues association study finds new technology not only drives demand but also increases spending.
Becker C
Mod Healthc; 2003 Nov; 33(45):9, 11. PubMed ID: 14666544
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The opportunities and challenges posed by the rapid growth of diagnostic imaging.
Rothenberg BM; Korn A
J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 May; 2(5):407-10. PubMed ID: 17411844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Cancer of the kidney in adults. Economic aspects].
Prog Urol; 1997 Nov; 7(5):901-4. PubMed ID: 9458486
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The viability of our specialty: the designated physician imager.
Borgstede JP
J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Feb; 2(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 17411774
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Imaging devices spread more thinly in Canada.
Brice J
Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1990 Mar; 12(3):137-45. PubMed ID: 10149352
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Health care inflation and high-tech medicine: a new look.
Pentecost MJ
J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Dec; 1(12):901-3. PubMed ID: 17411729
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Apocalypse soon?
Heilman RS
Radiographics; 2008; 28(5):1324. PubMed ID: 18794309
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Virtual realities. While 3-D diagnostic imaging has gained ground among providers, cost and reimbursement issues have hindered wider adoption.
Rhea S
Mod Healthc; 2009 Nov; 39(48):28-30. PubMed ID: 20027843
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Adapting.
Pearlman AS
J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2009 Sep; 22(9):1080-1. PubMed ID: 19733793
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The impact of new diagnostic technologies on health care. An aggregation of expert opinion.
Schmid GC; Poulin MM; McNeal BR
J Health Care Technol; 1986; 2(3):167-82. PubMed ID: 10317697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Appropriateness criteria: the double-edged sword.
Borgstede JP
J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Dec; 1(12):889-90. PubMed ID: 17411725
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A modality on the move.
Looney J
Adm Radiol J; 1996 May; 15(5):22-5. PubMed ID: 10158650
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [The price doesn't affect the number of orders for laboratory tests].
Jordin B; Kallner A; Nordström L
Lakartidningen; 2000 May; 97(20):2482-6. PubMed ID: 10909225
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Medical value vs cost and risk: redux.
Thrall JH
J Am Coll Radiol; 2010; 7(2):81-2. PubMed ID: 20142076
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Do family physicians know the costs of medical care? Survey in British Columbia.
Allan GM; Innes GD
Can Fam Physician; 2004 Feb; 50():263-70. PubMed ID: 15000338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The inappropriate use of imaging studies: a report of the 2004 Intersociety Conference.
Dunnick NR; Applegate KE; Arenson RL
J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 May; 2(5):401-6. PubMed ID: 17411843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Medical imaging as a contributor to today's healthcare crisis.
McVey L
Radiol Manage; 2008; 30(3):45-51. PubMed ID: 18572722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Diagnostic radiology--development and aspects].
Gerhardt P
Rontgenpraxis; 1990 Feb; 43(2):33-41. PubMed ID: 2406952
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Computerized system alerts docs to costs.
ED Manag; 1999 Sep; 11(9):100-2. PubMed ID: 10558096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
