236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10172810)
1. Trocar talk.
Souhrada L
Mater Manag Health Care; 1996 Nov; 5(11):48-50. PubMed ID: 10172810
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Laparoscopic instruments good outsourcing candidates.
Whittington S; Vasey N
Hosp Mater Manage; 1997 Jun; 22(6):14-5. PubMed ID: 10173016
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A close-up look at laparoscopic instrument costs.
Mater Manag Health Care; 1993 Nov; 2(11):28-32. PubMed ID: 10171719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Endoscope price hikes continue.
Hosp Mater Manage; 2005 Jun; 30(6):1, 12-4. PubMed ID: 16018418
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Trocars: safety and selection. Emergency Care Research Institute.
Health Devices; 1998 Nov; 27(11):376-99. PubMed ID: 9859030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Product evaluation process. A systems approach to controlling health care costs.
Weatherly KS; Kenwood L; Hlusko DL; Franklin KG
AORN J; 1994 Feb; 59(2):489-98. PubMed ID: 8147597
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Making the cut. High price tags for state-of-the art surgical equipment have hospitals weighing when or even whether to invest.
Gardner E
Mod Healthc; 2006 Feb; 36(7):50-2, 54, 56. PubMed ID: 16515075
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparing the cost of reusable and disposable packs.
MacLean C
Mater Manag Health Care; 1994 Feb; 3(2):24-6, 28. PubMed ID: 10131599
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Actual and estimated costs of disposable materials used during surgical procedures.
Toyabe S; Cao P; Kurashima S; Nakayama Y; Ishii Y; Hosoyama N; Akazawa K
Health Policy; 2005 Jul; 73(1):52-7. PubMed ID: 15911056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Study deems single-use instruments more cost-effective than reusable in lap choly procedures.
Hosp Mater Manage; 1995 Jul; 20(7):18-9. PubMed ID: 10172368
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The best of both worlds--'resposables'.
Abbott P
Todays Surg Nurse; 1997; 19(2):35-8. PubMed ID: 9233291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Laparoscopic and open appendectomies.
Pelosi M; Pelosi M
Surg Laparosc Endosc; 1995 Dec; 5(6):492-3. PubMed ID: 8612001
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Dilating missile trocar for primary port establishment: a cadaver study.
Tansatit T; Wisawasukmongchol W; Bunyavejchevin S; Jongsakul T; Chamsuwan S; Tansrisawad N; Hoonwijit U
J Med Assoc Thai; 2002 Jun; 85 Suppl 1():S320-6. PubMed ID: 12188430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Group contracts tempering LIS (laparoscopic instruments and supplies) prices.
Hosp Mater Manage; 1995 May; 20(5):1, 12-3. PubMed ID: 10172310
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Estimating the true costs of disposable and reusable instruments.
Mancuso R; Bickham MJ
AORN J; 1995 Jul; 62(1):39-42, 45, 47-8. PubMed ID: 7574563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Source reduction and the disposables vs. reusables debate.
Belkin NL
Regul Anal Med Waste; 1993 Jun; 1(9):6-11. PubMed ID: 10132846
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Reusables may slow rising tide of laparoscopic surgery costs.
Souhrada L
Mater Manag Health Care; 1993 Feb; 2(2):22. PubMed ID: 10171424
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Reusable sterile surgical packs give hospitals convenience at a low cost.
Weller C
Text Rent; 1989 Sep; 73(1):74-6, 79. PubMed ID: 10295757
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Disposable and reusable trocars.
Watson DI
Endosc Surg Allied Technol; 1995; 3(2-3):140-2. PubMed ID: 7552131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cutting costs or cutting corners? Cardiac cath reuse.
Wilson D
Mater Manag Health Care; 1997 May; 6(5):34, 36. PubMed ID: 10167493
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
