208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10172898)
1. Biomedical warfare.
Serafini MW
Natl J (Wash); 1997 Feb; 29(5):220-3. PubMed ID: 10172898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Outlining a new path for research.
Serafini MW
Natl J (Wash); 1996 Mar; 28(13):713, 716. PubMed ID: 10155832
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Disease-of-the-month alive and well.
Culliton BJ
Nature; 1992 Nov; 360(6399):13. PubMed ID: 1436066
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Opponents of US earmarks propose reviews to temper worst elements of growing practice.
Anderson C
Nature; 1992 Nov; 360(6399):4-5. PubMed ID: 1436072
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Your money or their lives. Patient advocates are learning from AIDS activists how to work the system.
Thompson D
Time; 1992 Oct; 140(15):66-8. PubMed ID: 10121154
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Setting priorities for research is no easy task at NIH.
Smeltz KJ
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1997 Sep; 89(18):1338-9. PubMed ID: 9308702
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. AIDs, activism, and the politics of health.
Wachter RM
N Engl J Med; 1992 Jan; 326(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 1727220
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Congressional rites of passage for the rights of alcoholics.
Lewis JS
Alcohol Health Res World; 1988; 12(4):240-51. PubMed ID: 10314322
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Alzheimer's disease. Getting on the federal agenda.
McConnell S; Rusio D
Caring; 1991 Dec; 10(12):4-8, 10. PubMed ID: 10170885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mental health advocates complain about NIMH priority for AIDS. National Institute of Mental Health.
AIDS Policy Law; 2000 Jan; 15(1):5. PubMed ID: 11367224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Perspectives. Researchers protest congressional "meddling".
Kent C
Faulkner Grays Med Health; 1992 Nov; 46(45):suppl 4 p.. PubMed ID: 10121800
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Is NIH AIDS research in danger? National Institutes of Health.
Roehr B
AIDS Treat News; 1995 Aug; (no 229):7-8. PubMed ID: 11362632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. NIH's way of setting priorities endorsed.
Wadman M
Nature; 1998 Mar; 392(6672):116. PubMed ID: 9515947
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. No time for an AIDS backlash.
Murphy TF
Hastings Cent Rep; 1991; 21(2):7-11. PubMed ID: 2045284
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Texas' AIDS care still unraveling.
Zoler ML
Med World News; 1988 Jun; 29(11):59-60. PubMed ID: 10287670
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Anguish and opportunity.
Kosterlitz J
Natl J (Wash); 1990 Apr; 22(17):1008-15. PubMed ID: 10170540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. National Institutes of Health Center Grants. Final rule.
National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services
Fed Regist; 2003 Dec; 68(240):69619-22. PubMed ID: 14674396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A developing theme for AIDS.
Watanabe M
Nature; 2003 Dec; 426(6967):736-7. PubMed ID: 14668887
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Advocacy is needed to promote research into diseases of physical inactivity.
Booth F; Gordon S
Exerc Sport Sci Rev; 2000 Oct; 28(4):145-7. PubMed ID: 11064846
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. National Cancer Act: a look back and forward.
Vanchieri C
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Mar; 99(5):342-5. PubMed ID: 17341721
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
