251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10172943)
1. Corrective actions: what to do when control results are out of control.
Seehafer JJ
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1997 Mar; 29(3):34-6, 40. PubMed ID: 10172943
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation and use of laboratory instrumentation for office hematology procedures.
Koepke JA
Prog Hematol; 1987; 15():243-60. PubMed ID: 3332391
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Quality control practices and preferences in today's clinical laboratory. A report for government regulators, decision makers, and advisors.
Cooper WG
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1997 Jun; 29(6):56-7, 60, 62-5. PubMed ID: 10173036
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Establishing and evaluating QC acceptability criteria.
Westgard JO; Quam EF; Barry PL
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1994 Feb; 26(2):22-6. PubMed ID: 10171791
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Saving laboratory records: what, how, how long?
Baer D
MLO Med Lab Obs; 2004 May; 36(5):10-1, 14-6; quiz 18-20. PubMed ID: 15179913
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical laboratory measurements traceable to the National Reference System for Cholesterol.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 1994 Mar; 43(8):149-51. PubMed ID: 8309465
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Laboratory proficiency testing sports anomalies.
Laubenthal C
MLO Med Lab Obs; 2004 Feb; 36(2):52. PubMed ID: 15002153
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Quality control in the automated central laboratory.
Bell WN
J La State Med Soc; 1973 Sep; 125(9):305-8. PubMed ID: 4760128
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The hybrid laboratory: shifting the focus to the point of care.
Kost GJ
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1992 Sep; 24(9S Suppl):17-21, 24-8. PubMed ID: 10171231
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. How total error can save time and money for the lab.
Brooks Z; Massarella G; Plaut D
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1994 Nov; 26(11):48, 50, 52-4. PubMed ID: 10172159
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Roundtable, Part 4. Streamline your automated hematology laboratory.
Cornbleet J; Fernandes BJ; Miers M
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1997 Apr; 29(4):68, 70, 72-3. PubMed ID: 10166880
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. European standards and the In Vitro Diagnostic Directive: current status.
Suppo M
Med Device Technol; 1996; 7(6):26-9. PubMed ID: 10172759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Buying lab equipment: comparative analysis reveals operating costs.
Bunata EV
Mater Manag Health Care; 1992 Sep; 1(7):28-9. PubMed ID: 10171421
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A program for assessing statistical QC procedures.
Westgard JO
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1994 Feb; 26(2):55, 58-60. PubMed ID: 10171792
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Quality control over the results obtained with automatic analyzers].
Lambreva L; Dimitrov D; Razsolkov M; Angelova A; Bozhilova M
Vutr Boles; 1980; 19(4):104-8. PubMed ID: 7415154
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A respiratory care view of point-of-care blood gas and electrolyte testing.
Berlin SL
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1991; 23(9S Spec No):37-41. PubMed ID: 10170834
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Errors in pathology and laboratory medicine: consequences and prevention.
Hollensead SC; Lockwood WB; Elin RJ
J Surg Oncol; 2004 Dec; 88(3):161-81. PubMed ID: 15562462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Interlaboratory cholesterol standardization: a model project.
Noel SA; Wenk RE; Lustgarten JA; Koch TR
Clin Lab Sci; 1990; 3(4):237-8. PubMed ID: 10171104
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Spreadsheet templates for calculating precision according to NCCLS (National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards) guidelines.
Smith MC; Sephel GC; Woodward SC
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1993 Oct; 25(10):67-9. PubMed ID: 10171728
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. External hematology quality assurance initiative in Asia. Asian Quality Assurance Survey (AQuAS)Program.
Lee KN; Yoon SY; Cho HI; Tatsumi N; Maramba T
Lab Hematol; 2004; 10(3):152-7. PubMed ID: 15529428
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
