These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

63 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10173071)

  • 1. Finite Element analyses to study periprosthetic bone adaptation.
    Weinans H; Sumner DR
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1997; 40():3-16. PubMed ID: 10173071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bone ingrowth into a porous coated implant predicted by a mechano-regulatory tissue differentiation algorithm.
    Liu X; Niebur GL
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2008 Aug; 7(4):335-44. PubMed ID: 17701434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Numeric simulation of time-dependent remodeling of bone around loaded oral implants.
    Eser A; Tonuk E; Akca K; Cehreli MC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):597-608. PubMed ID: 19885399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis of bone-implant interaction phenomena by using a numerical approach.
    Natali AN; Pavan PG; Ruggero AL
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Feb; 17(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 16441786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of an inhomogeneous orthotropic and isotropic material models used for FE analyses.
    Baca V; Horak Z; Mikulenka P; Dzupa V
    Med Eng Phys; 2008 Sep; 30(7):924-30. PubMed ID: 18243761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation of adaptive bone-remodeling simulation models.
    Huiskes R
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1997; 40():33-48. PubMed ID: 10168881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A convenient approach for finite-element-analyses of orthopaedic implants in bone contact: modeling and experimental validation.
    Kluess D; Souffrant R; Mittelmeier W; Wree A; Schmitz KP; Bader R
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2009 Jul; 95(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 19231021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: a review of the literature.
    Geng JP; Tan KB; Liu GR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jun; 85(6):585-98. PubMed ID: 11404759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Threaded versus porous-surfaced implants as anchorage units for orthodontic treatment: three-dimensional finite element analysis of peri-implant bone tissue stresses.
    Pilliar RM; Sagals G; Meguid SA; Oyonarte R; Deporter DA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(6):879-89. PubMed ID: 17190297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A universal algorithm for an improved finite element mesh generation Mesh quality assessment in comparison to former automated mesh-generators and an analytic model.
    Kaminsky J; Rodt T; Gharabaghi A; Forster J; Brand G; Samii M
    Med Eng Phys; 2005 Jun; 27(5):383-94. PubMed ID: 15863347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mechanical significance of femoral head trabecular bone structure in Loris and Galago evaluated using micromechanical finite element models.
    Ryan TM; van Rietbergen B
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2005 Jan; 126(1):82-96. PubMed ID: 15386240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of micro-level and continuum-level voxel models of the proximal femur.
    Verhulp E; van Rietbergen B; Huiskes R
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(16):2951-7. PubMed ID: 16359680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [3D finite element analysis of bone stress around distally osseointegrated implant for artificial limb attachment].
    Zheng L; Luo J; Wang X; Chen J; Gu Z; Zhang X
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Jun; 24(3):554-7. PubMed ID: 17713260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Numerical/experimental analysis of the stress field around miniscrews for orthodontic anchorage.
    Gracco A; Cirignaco A; Cozzani M; Boccaccio A; Pappalettere C; Vitale G
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Feb; 31(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 19088058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Numerical simulation of bone regeneration in a bone chamber.
    Geris L; Vandamme K; Naert I; Vander Sloten J; Duyck J; Van Oosterwyck H
    J Dent Res; 2009 Feb; 88(2):158-63. PubMed ID: 19278988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Three-dimensional numerical simulation of dental implants as orthodontic anchorage.
    Gallas MM; Abeleira MT; Fernández JR; Burguera M
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Feb; 27(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 15743858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of two numerical approaches for bone remodelling.
    Chen G; Pettet G; Pearcy M; McElwain DL
    Med Eng Phys; 2007 Jan; 29(1):134-9. PubMed ID: 16458567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A finite element stress analysis of the transmandibular implant system.
    Williams KR; Murphy WM
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(2):115-9. PubMed ID: 11843446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Wolff's law-based continuum topology optimization method and its application in biomechanics].
    Cai K; Zhang H; Luo Y; Chen B
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Apr; 25(2):331-5. PubMed ID: 18610617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Trabecular bone remodeling phenomenon as a pattern for structural optimization.
    Nowak M
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 133():196-200. PubMed ID: 18376027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.