These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10173416)

  • 1. Class actions in breast implant litigation.
    Peerless MJ; Eizenga MA
    Health Law Can; 1996 Feb; 16(3):78-83. PubMed ID: 10173416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Silicone breast implants. Can emerging medical, legal, and scientific concepts be reconciled?
    Snyder JW
    J Leg Med; 1997 Jun; 18(2):133-220. PubMed ID: 9230567
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Silicone breast implant litigation (Part 2).
    Shiffman MA
    Med Law; 1995; 14(1-2):59-85. PubMed ID: 7666749
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Legal developments in healthcare.
    Holubitsky DJ
    Leadersh Health Serv; 1996; 5(4):30-3. PubMed ID: 10159552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Silicone breast implant litigation (Part 1).
    Shiffman MA
    Med Law; 1994; 13(7-8):681-716. PubMed ID: 7731351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Product liability implications of biomaterials in the United States.
    Price JM
    Clin Mater; 1994; 16(4):223-7. PubMed ID: 10184317
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Canadian perspective: trends in drug and medical device class actions in Canada.
    Vernon W
    Food Drug Law J; 2006; 61(3):569-76. PubMed ID: 16989040
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Silicone breast implants may be close to US approval.
    Ault A
    Lancet; 2003 Oct; 362(9393):1384. PubMed ID: 14594002
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perspectives. Battle heats up over product liability reform.
    Miller D
    Faulkner Grays Med Health; 1995 Apr; 49(17):suppl 1-4. PubMed ID: 10141116
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Can Missouri health care providers be held liable under strict product liability law?
    Cole CH
    Mo Med; 1995 Sep; 92(9):581-3. PubMed ID: 7476832
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Science in the courtroom. A new approach.
    Dresser R
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1999; 29(3):26-7. PubMed ID: 10420302
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Legally speaking. Who's to blame for faulty equipment?
    Tammelleo AD
    RN; 1990 Oct; 53(10):67-72. PubMed ID: 2218328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Breast implants, Hippocrates, and burden of proof.
    McGivney WT
    Physician Exec; 1992; 18(2):54-5. PubMed ID: 10171041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Medical device recalls from 2004 to 2006: a focus on Class I recalls.
    Villarraga ML; Guerin HL; Lam T
    Food Drug Law J; 2007; 62(3):581-92. PubMed ID: 17915400
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Litigation rules and culture: the European perspective.
    Mildred M
    Rev Law Soc Change; 1997; 23(3):433-42. PubMed ID: 10725054
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Daubert and the breast implant litigation: how is the judiciary addressing the science?
    Reed ME
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1997 Oct; 100(5):1322-6. PubMed ID: 9326800
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. "Insuring" the continued solvency of pharmaceutical companies in the face of product liability class actions.
    Chodock R; Yolkut D; Connolly DR
    Tort Trial Insur Pract Law J; 2005; 40(3):997-1017. PubMed ID: 16100814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The complexity of litigation associated with robotic surgery and cybersurgery.
    McLean T
    Int J Med Robot; 2007 Mar; 3():23-9. PubMed ID: 17441022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of products liability on bulk suppliers of biomaterials.
    Baker FD
    Food Drug Law J; 1995; 50(3):455-60. PubMed ID: 10343012
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Premarket approval and federal preemption of product liability claims in the wake of Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr.
    Jarcho DG
    Food Drug Law J; 1996; 51(4):613-8. PubMed ID: 11797730
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.