127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10173785)
1. A new continuous quality improvement model for the coding process.
Callen J; Meehan J; Tomornsak S
Health Inf Manag; 1997; 27(2):69-73. PubMed ID: 10173785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A review of hospital medical record audits: implications for funding and training.
Stevens S; Unwin CE; Codde JP
Aust Health Rev; 1998; 21(3):78-91. PubMed ID: 10185695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sharing resources for coding quality improvement.
Mills S
J AHIMA; 2000 Feb; 71(2):79-80. PubMed ID: 10977645
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Developing a quality management program for coded data.
Hyde LA
J AHIMA; 1992 Jan; 63(1):50-2. PubMed ID: 10118234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Rural cooperative coding project.
Schara JK
J AHIMA; 1995 Sep; 66(8):59-63. PubMed ID: 10144979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ongoing coding reviews: ways to ensure quality.
Thompson NS; Koch D
J AHIMA; 1999 Jan; 70(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 10339004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multilevel reviews for coding accuracy.
Stavely S
Top Health Inf Manage; 2000 Nov; 21(2):30-3. PubMed ID: 11143277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Continuous quality improvement of coded data: a data quality study for Category 650.
Laing JM
J AHIMA; 1992 Jan; 63(1):54-6. PubMed ID: 10118235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Honest mistake or fraud? Meeting the coding compliance challenge.
Averill RF
J AHIMA; 1999 May; 70(5):16-21; quiz 23-4. PubMed ID: 10387641
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The effects of automated encoders on coding accuracy and coding speed.
Lloyd SS; Layman E
Top Health Inf Manage; 1997 Feb; 17(3):72-9. PubMed ID: 10165389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessing the impact of automated coding & grouping technology at St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney.
Howes MH
Aust Med Rec J; 1993 Dec; 23(4):117-22. PubMed ID: 10138775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The development of medical record services in Hong Kong public hospitals.
Fung V
Health Inf Manag; 1994 Dec; 24(4):151-2. PubMed ID: 10142476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Computer assisted coding quality management.
Servais C
J AHIMA; 1992 Jan; 63(1):42-9. PubMed ID: 10118233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Better coding through improved documentation: strategies for the current environment.
MacDonald E
J AHIMA; 1999 Jan; 70(1):32-5; quiz 37-8. PubMed ID: 10339002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Concurrent coding provides more accurate data for outcomes and performance reports.
Data Strateg Benchmarks; 1997 Aug; 1(2):25-7, 17. PubMed ID: 10345330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performing a manual coding audit.
Hammen C
J AHIMA; 1999 Jun; 70(6):16-8. PubMed ID: 10537619
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Keys to auditing hospital and professional fee coding.
Driggs RC; Zupko MJ
J AHIMA; 2000 Jun; 71(6):42-6; quiz 47-8. PubMed ID: 11010093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Coding beyond 2000? The encoder experience at Echuca.
Boal A
Health Inf Manag; 1996; 26(1):30-1. PubMed ID: 10162779
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A focused approach to coding quality control.
Green DK
Top Health Rec Manage; 1986 Sep; 7(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 10311648
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The White Paper: a focus on clinical coding.
Johnson R
IHRIM; 1998 Aug; 39(3):40. PubMed ID: 10185795
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
