132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10174236)
1. PPO accreditation: who's in the driver's seat?
Ballard M
Health Care Innov; 1997; 7(5):10-6. PubMed ID: 10174236
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Updating PPO accreditation.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2001 Mar; 21(3):4. PubMed ID: 11270204
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Board leadership: Who's in the driver's seat?
McGinn P
Trustee; 2006; 59(10):34. PubMed ID: 17176725
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Measuring PPO performance is an inexact science at best.
Data Strateg Benchmarks; 2001 Feb; 5(2):28-30, 17. PubMed ID: 11255788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The PPO accreditation contest. Competition among the big guns may hamper universal standards.
Lovern E
Mod Healthc; 2001 Jan; 31(5):4-5. PubMed ID: 11219033
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. CareFirst commits to NCQA PPO plan accreditation program.
Healthc Leadersh Manag Rep; 2000 Nov; 8(11):15-6. PubMed ID: 11151844
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. What does accreditation mean for PPOs?
Weinman LV
Manag Care Interface; 1998 Aug; 11(8):44-6, 49. PubMed ID: 10182236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Who's minding the PPOs?
Moskowitz DB
Bus Health; 1999 May; 17(5):47. PubMed ID: 10387677
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Due diligence of provider sponsored organizations.
Elden DL
Health Care Innov; 1997; 7(3):8, 26-30. PubMed ID: 10167700
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Asking the right questions in HMO and PPO evaluation.
Millikan DL
Healthc Financ Manage; 1986 May; 40(5):38-41. PubMed ID: 10300703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A prescription for survival.
Kelly KW
Med Interface; 1995 Oct; 8(10):64-5. PubMed ID: 10152324
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. 2008 accreditation decision rules for all programs.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2007 Aug; 27(8):3-9. PubMed ID: 17953314
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. What to look for in a PPO.
McCarthy R
Bus Health; 1998 May; 16(5):56. PubMed ID: 10181043
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Change in the process for organizations in which their survey reports meet a rule for conditional accreditation or preliminary denial of accreditation decision.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Sep; 24(9):7. PubMed ID: 15484653
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Approved: remaining component to the accreditation decision methodology for 2009.
Joint Commission
Jt Comm Perspect; 2008 Dec; 28(12):3-4. PubMed ID: 19186441
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Hospitals, group practices are taking a harder look at HMO, PPO offers.
Hickey K; O'Gara N
Mod Healthc; 1986 Apr; 16(8):104, 106. PubMed ID: 10275950
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Private Healthcare Systems reorganizes.
Kertesz L
Mod Healthc; 1995 Feb; 25(9):12. PubMed ID: 10140267
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. AmHS, Provident cancel PPO pact.
Greene J
Mod Healthc; 1988 Jul; 18(30):6. PubMed ID: 10288185
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Accreditation Committee keeps tabs on important accreditation issues.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2002 Dec; 22(12):8-9. PubMed ID: 12506452
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Potential outcomes of type Is explained. Conditional accreditation twice in one accreditation cycle triggers PDA rule.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2002 Jun; 22(6):2-3. PubMed ID: 12094778
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
