These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

68 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1017453)

  • 1. Differences in the sequential integration of form as a function of age and interstimulus interval.
    Kline DW; Baffa G
    Exp Aging Res; 1976 Jul; 2(4):333-43. PubMed ID: 1017453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dichoptic backward masking of letters, words, and trigrams in old and young subjects.
    Cramer G; Kietzman ML; van Laer J
    Exp Aging Res; 1982; 8(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 7128655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Examination of stimulus persistence as the basis for superior visual identification performance among older adults.
    Kline DW; Orme-Rogers C
    J Gerontol; 1978 Jan; 33(1):76-81. PubMed ID: 618969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Temporal integration deficit in visual information processing by chronic schizophrenics.
    Schwartz BD; Winstead DK; Adinoff B
    Biol Psychiatry; 1983 Nov; 18(11):1311-20. PubMed ID: 6652164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Differences in unconspicuous word identification as a function of age and reversible-figure training.
    Kline DW; Culler MP; Sucec J
    Exp Aging Res; 1977 May; 3(3):203-13. PubMed ID: 913470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adult age differences in visual word recognition: semantic encoding and episodic retention.
    Madden DJ
    Exp Aging Res; 1986; 12(2):71-8. PubMed ID: 3569387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Age differences in the temporal continuity of gratings as a function of their spatial frequency.
    Kline DW; Scialfa CT; Lyman BJ; Schieber F
    Exp Aging Res; 1990; 16(1-2):61-5. PubMed ID: 2265667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Latency differences of visual evoked potentials in binocular and monocular checkerboard stimulation as well as age and sex dependence].
    Knierim A; Emser W; Schimrigk K
    EEG EMG Z Elektroenzephalogr Elektromyogr Verwandte Geb; 1985 Dec; 16(4):212-4. PubMed ID: 3935416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Immediate and delayed recognition of sequentially presented random shapes.
    Hines D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1975 Sep; 1(5):634-9. PubMed ID: 1176896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Relationship between recognition asymmetry and the interval between the stimuli of a dichoptic complex].
    Bagdonas A; Kochiunene N
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1977; 27(4):838-46. PubMed ID: 919771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stimulus persistence and age.
    Coyne AC; Eiler JM; Vanderplas JM; Botwinick J
    Exp Aging Res; 1979 Jun; 5(3):263-70. PubMed ID: 520384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Persistence of complementary afterimages as a function of adult age and exposure duration.
    Kline DW; Nestor S
    Exp Aging Res; 1977 May; 3(3):191-201. PubMed ID: 913469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Kanizsa subjective figures capture visual spatial attention: evidence from electrophysiological and behavioral data.
    Senkowski D; Röttger S; Grimm S; Foxe JJ; Herrmann CS
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(6):872-86. PubMed ID: 15716159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Effects of structural and naming factors of letters upon the recognition of tachistoscopic letters (author's transl)].
    Kitamori A
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1981 Apr; 52(1):61-4. PubMed ID: 7300053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reaction time and the psychological refractory period in children and adults.
    Surwillo WW; Titus TG
    Dev Psychobiol; 1976 Nov; 9(6):517-27. PubMed ID: 1001837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Age and the identification of inconspicuous words.
    Kline DW; Hogan PM; Stier DL
    Exp Aging Res; 1980 Apr; 6(2):137-47. PubMed ID: 7389783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Aging and comparative search for feature differences.
    Gottlob LR
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2006; 13(3-4):435-57. PubMed ID: 16887782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Differential processing of hierarchical visual stimuli in young and older healthy adults: implications for pathology.
    Lux S; Marshall JC; Thimm M; Fink GR
    Cortex; 2008 Jan; 44(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 18387528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Age, response complexity, and target consistency in visual search.
    Plude DJ; Hoyer WJ; Lazar J
    Exp Aging Res; 1982; 8(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 7128660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. EEG alpha slowing, refractory period, and reaction time in aging.
    Woodruff DS; Kramer DA
    Exp Aging Res; 1979 Aug; 5(4):279-92. PubMed ID: 520385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.