174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10175263)
21. JCAHO: failed program taught useful lessons.
Hosp Peer Rev; 1999 Aug; 24(8):120-2. PubMed ID: 10621288
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. The Joint Commission's ORYX initiative.
Popovich M
Caring; 1998 Jun; 17(6):44-5. PubMed ID: 10181305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Education key to helping administrators accept ORYX.
Hosp Peer Rev; 2000 Jul; 25(7):85-7. PubMed ID: 11184551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. ORYX requirements simplified.
Jt Comm Perspect; 1999; 19(3):4. PubMed ID: 10538768
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Present comparative data effectively.
Spath P
Hosp Peer Rev; 2001 Mar; 26(3):34, 39-40. PubMed ID: 11246793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Meet the mandate to measure clinical quality.
Pasternak DP; Pine M
Physician Exec; 1997; 23(7):40-3. PubMed ID: 10170421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Calculating the ORYX 20 percent requirement.
Weber D
QRC Advis; 1997 Nov; 14(1):5. PubMed ID: 10175181
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. ORYX: March 2 is breathing down your neck.
Hosp Peer Rev; 1998 Mar; 23(3):50-2. PubMed ID: 10177594
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Use ORYX to achieve your quality improvement goals.
Hosp Peer Rev; 2000 Jun; 25(6):74, 79. PubMed ID: 11184107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Outcomes-based accreditation evolves slowly with JCAHO's Oryx initiative.
Campbell S
Health Care Strateg Manage; 1997 Apr; 15(4):12-3. PubMed ID: 10166108
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. A welcome delay. Small hospitals applaud JCAHO Oryx extension.
Moore JD
Mod Healthc; 1998 Jan; 28(1):14-5. PubMed ID: 10175894
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Integrating outcomes into the accreditation process.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2000; 20(1):1, 3. PubMed ID: 11009950
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Oryx gears up. JCAHO outcomes measurement plan causes few ripples.
Moore JD
Mod Healthc; 1997 Mar; 27(9):17, 20, 22. PubMed ID: 10165064
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. JCAHO standards and performance measurement systems. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations.
Hanold L; Koss RG; McBeth S
Behav Healthc Tomorrow; 1997 Dec; 6(6):39-40. PubMed ID: 10177345
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Reviewing the data: what ORYX means to you.
Homa-Lowry J
Hosp Case Manag; 1998 Oct; 6(10):195-6, 201-2, 207. PubMed ID: 10185917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Accreditation requirements for ORYX: the next evolution in accreditation.
Zeglen M
J AHIMA; 1997 Jun; 68(6):20-2, 24-31. PubMed ID: 10167799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A primer on JCAHO performance data.
Data Strateg Benchmarks; 2002 Mar; 6(3):37-9. PubMed ID: 11951364
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. ORYX data transmission requirement suspended for behavioral health care, home care, and long term care.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2002 Dec; 22(12):6-7, 15. PubMed ID: 12506451
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Hospital industry balks at Oryx change.
Moore JD
Mod Healthc; 1999 Jan; 29(2):3. PubMed ID: 10344850
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. ORYX. The next evolution in accreditation. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations.
Nurs Manage; 1997 May; 28(5):49-52, 54. PubMed ID: 9287797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
