These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10175267)

  • 1. Improved accuracy of nutrition information in popular magazines.
    Kava R
    Health Care Food Nutr Focus; 1997 Nov; 14(3):8-10. PubMed ID: 10175267
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The impact of the impact factor.
    Manske PR
    J Hand Surg Am; 2004 Nov; 29(6):983-6. PubMed ID: 15576205
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. What weight does impact factor carry?
    Aase S
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2008 Oct; 108(10):1604-7. PubMed ID: 18926118
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Review of nutrition education research in the Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 1998 to 2007.
    Contento I
    J Nutr Educ Behav; 2008; 40(6):331-40. PubMed ID: 18984488
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The misused impact factor.
    Simons K
    Science; 2008 Oct; 322(5899):165. PubMed ID: 18845714
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of newspaper reports of nutrition-related research.
    Hackman EM; Moe GL
    J Am Diet Assoc; 1999 Dec; 99(12):1564-6. PubMed ID: 10608952
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modellers seek reason for low retraction rates.
    Butler D; Hogan J
    Nature; 2007 May; 447(7142):236-7. PubMed ID: 17507938
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact factor rises again.
    Dunnett SB
    Brain Res Bull; 2004 Dec; 64(4):285-7. PubMed ID: 15561462
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The first decade of the Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior.
    Briggs C; Briggs M
    J Nutr Educ Behav; 2008; 40(3):125-33. PubMed ID: 18457780
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The real value of the impact factors].
    Puche RC
    Medicina (B Aires); 2003; 63(4):355-7. PubMed ID: 14518150
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact factors: target the funding bodies.
    Insall R
    Nature; 2003 Jun; 423(6940):585. PubMed ID: 12789312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A rose by any other name is still a rose: assessing journal quality.
    Broome ME
    Nurs Outlook; 2007; 55(4):163-4. PubMed ID: 17678678
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Journals: impact factors are too highly valued.
    Davies J
    Nature; 2003 Jan; 421(6920):210. PubMed ID: 12529611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quality evaluation needs some better quality tools.
    Döring TF
    Nature; 2007 Feb; 445(7129):709. PubMed ID: 17301769
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On judgment, impact factor and feelings: what can we learn from the impact factor?
    Fatović-Ferencić S
    Croat Med J; 2004 Jun; 45(3):344-5. PubMed ID: 15190920
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact factors aren't top journals' sole attraction.
    Törnqvist TE
    Nature; 2003 May; 423(6939):480. PubMed ID: 12774096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Challenging the tyranny of impact factors.
    Colquhoun D
    Nature; 2003 May; 423(6939):479; discussion 480. PubMed ID: 12774093
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ratings and rankings: judging the evaluation of quality.
    Broome ME
    Nurs Outlook; 2005; 53(5):215-6. PubMed ID: 16226562
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The counting house.
    Adam D
    Nature; 2002 Feb; 415(6873):726-9. PubMed ID: 11845174
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Molecular Nutrition & Food Research - the journal's impact after 5 years.
    Schreier P; Humpf HU
    Mol Nutr Food Res; 2010 Jan; 54(1):5. PubMed ID: 20058220
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.